Medications & Psychiatry

 email page    print page

All Topic Reviews
Psychiatry Under the InfluenceAlternatives Beyond PsychiatryAmerican MadnessAmerican PsychosisAn Unquiet MindAntipsychiatryBad PharmaBefore ProzacBetter Than ProzacBiological PsychiatryBipolar, Not So MuchBlack Man in a White CoatBlaming the BrainBrain Science and Psychological DisordersBrainwashedClinical Psychopharmacology Made Ridiculously SimpleComfortably NumbCompassion and Healing in Medicine and SocietyComplete Mental HealthConcise Guide to PsychopharmacologyCrackedCritical PsychiatryCultural FormulationDeconstructing PsychosisDemystifying PsychiatryDiagnosing the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersDiagnosis: SchizophreniaDiagnostic Issues in Depression and Generalized Anxiety DisorderDimensional Models of Personality DisordersDisordered Personalities and CrimeDoctoring the MindDoctors of DeceptionDrop the Disorder!DruggedDrugs for LifeEmpirical Ethics in PsychiatryEssential PsychopharmacologyEssential Psychopharmacology of Depression and Bipolar DisorderEssentials of Psychiatric DiagnosisEsssential Philosophy of PsychiatryEthics in PsychiatryEvidence-Based Treatment of Personality DysfunctionExercise-Based Interventions for Mental IllnessFinding the Right Psychiatrist:Forces of HabitHandbook of Clinical Psychopharmacology for TherapistsHappy Pills in AmericaHealing the Soul in the Age of the BrainHelping Parents, Youth, and Teachers Understand Medications for Behavioral and Emotional ProblemsHerbs for the MindHigh PriceHippocrates CriedHistory of Psychiatry and Medical PsychologyHookedHuman TrialsInfectious MadnessInspired SleepIntoxicating MindsIs It Me or My Meds?Let Them Eat ProzacLife-Threatening Effects of Antipsychotic DrugsLitLiving with Bipolar DisorderMad in AmericaMad ScienceMalignant SadnessMedicating ChildrenMedicating Modern AmericaMental Health in Asia and the PacificMind FixersMoments of EngagementMommy I'm Still in HereNatural Healing for DepressionNo One Cares About Crazy PeopleNot CrazyOrdinarily WellOur Daily MedsOverdosed AmericaPathologist of the MindPediatric PsychopharmacologyPediatric PsychopharmacologyPediatric PsychopharmacologyPharmaceutical FreedomPharmacracyPharmageddonPharmageddonPhilosophical Issues in PharmaceuticsPoets on ProzacPower HerbsPowerful MedicinesPrescriptions for the MindProfits Before People?Prozac and the New AntidepressantsProzac As a Way of LifeProzac BacklashProzac DiaryProzac on the CouchPsychiatric DiagnosisPsychiatric HegemonyPsychiatrists and Traditional HealersPsychiatry and EmpirePsychiatry and the Business of MadnessPsychiatry as Cognitive NeurosciencePsychiatry at a GlancePsychiatry in PrisonsPsychiatry ReconsideredPsychopathyPsychopharmacology Problem SolvingPsychotropic Drug Prescriber's Survival GuidePsychotropic Drugs And Popular CulturePsychotropic Drugs: Fast FactsRaising Generation RxRe-Visioning PsychiatryRecovery from SchizophreniaReligious and Spiritual Issues in Psychiatric DiagnosisRitalin NationRunning on RitalinRutter's Child and Adolescent PsychiatrySaving NormalSchizophreniaShock TherapyShock TherapyShould I Medicate My Child?ShrinksSide EffectsSometimes Amazing Things HappenStraight Talk about Psychiatric Medications for KidsSuccessful PsychopharmacologySuffer the ChildrenTaking America Off DrugsTalking Back to ProzacTextbook of Cultural PsychiatryThe $800 Million PillThe Age of AnxietyThe Anti-Depressant Fact BookThe Antidepressant EraThe Antidepressant SolutionThe Antidepressant Survival ProgramThe Big FixThe Book of WoeThe Complete Guide to Herbal MedicinesThe Conceptual Evolution of DSM-5The CorrectionsThe Creation of PsychopharmacologyThe Cult of PharmacologyThe Dream DrugstoreThe Emperor's New DrugsThe Essential Guide to Prescription Drugs 2005The Essential Guide to Prescription Drugs 2006The Making of DSM-III®The Medical Model in Mental HealthThe Medicated ChildThe Medication QuestionThe Merck DruggernautThe Mind/Mood Pill BookThe Natural Pharmacist : Natural Health Bible from the Most Trusted Alternative Health Site in the World The Pill BookThe Pill Book Guide to Natural MedicinesThe PlaceboThe Rise and Fall of the Biopsychosocial ModelThe Sedated SocietyThe Therapist's Guide to PsychopharmacologyThe Therapist's Guide to Psychopharmacology, Revised EditionThe Truth About the Drug CompaniesThe Use and Misuse of Psychiatric DrugsThe World of CaffeineThomas S. SzaszToxic PsychiatryTrouble in MindTry to RememberTry to RememberTwilight of American SanityUnderstanding Physician-Pharmaceutical Industry InteractionsUnhingedVoluntary MadnessWarning: Psychiatry Can Be Hazardous to Your Mental HealthWhat Is Mental Illness?What Psychiatry Left Out of the DSM-5What Works for Whom?Will@epicqwest.comWomen, Madness and MedicineYour Drug May Be Your Problem

Related Topics
Comfortably NumbReview - Comfortably Numb
How Psychiatry Is Medicating a Nation
by Charles Barber
Pantheon, 2008
Review by Nassir Ghaemi, M.D., M.A., M.P.H.
Sep 2nd 2008 (Volume 12, Issue 36)

In the growing genre of anti-pharmaceutical industry books, this one is focused on psychiatry, rather than general medicine, and here the biological approach to psychiatry gets added to the target list.  Prophecies of doom ("pharmageddon") appear to have become a trade publishing standard, and this prominently published book is no exception.  I find the rhetorical tone of many such books off-putting, but debate about their content is nonetheless important.

This book has more merits than many of its peers.  The author is a psychiatrist, recently graduated from his specialty training, with a preceding decade of experience as a counselor to the homeless mentally ill.  He thus has the advantage of knowing that there is such a thing as serious psychiatric disease; his critique is not meant, by him at least, to argue against medications in general or even biological psychiatry per se. Rather, he thinks things are being overdone, and medications used in those without mental illnesses in a manner that is not effective and perhaps harmful.  There are interesting data to support this claim, some of which are not in the book: For instance, a recent epidemiological study (the National Comorbidity Survey) found that about one-half of persons diagnosable with mental illness were not currently in treatment, but also about one-half of persons currently in treatment were not diagnosable with current mental illnesses. The proposal then becomes not the one-sided claim that psychiatry is overmedicating everyone, but rather that the wrong people are getting medicated.

This question is more interesting to me than the increasingly well-worn critique of the pharmaceutical industry and "corporate psychiatry" and puts the book into another genre:  books which promote (most famously Peter Kramer's 1993 Listening to Prozac, and Kramer's 2005 Against Depression) versus those which oppose (most prominently, David Healy's 1998 Antidepressant Era,  Carl Elliott's 2006 Better than Well, Hurwitz and Wakefield's 2007 Loss of Sadness, among others) antidepressants.  The anti-antidepressant books seem to outnumber the pro-antidepressant books, and Kramer comes in for some pointed criticism here:  Barber writes  is that we should be listening to patients, not Prozac. Yet Kramer's point was that after years of listening to patients in psychotherapy, he achieved more success for their character traits (not severe depression) after giving them Prozac as well.  "Nobody writes about Prozac like that anymore!", notes Barber as he argues that a massive change happened in the 1990s, whereby antidepressant use surged and the biological approach to psychiatry took over our culture.  Perhaps, since his training is more recent than mine, I have more of a sense of continuity.  Psychiatry seemed quite biological to me in 1991 when I first entered the field, and it is still so.  We used a lot of medications then; we still do, they just have different names.  The implication that Kramer is something like a psychopharmacological Luddite conflicts with my experience that there is still a lot of interest in Prozac and antidepressants among rank-and-file psychiatrists, many of whom saw the limits of the psychotherapy era in prior decades.   

Barber's basic thesis has validity: if we grant the utility of antidepressants for severe depression, we can still critique their widespread usage for "subsyndromal depression" in Barber's phrase, or "community nervousness" as Healy puts it.  This basic misery of human life is an existential, not a medical, fact, and Americans are culturally prone to trying to medicate it away. I think there is truth to this interpretation.  What might be added is that the concept was legislated away in DSM-III in 1980, when "neurotic depression" was removed from our diagnostic lexicon, and only "Major depressive disorder" was left (with a compromise to create "dysthymia" and "generalized anxiety disorder" to partially capture the prior neurotic depression group, as Healy describes well in his book).  Neurotic depression was the bread-and-butter of psychoanalysis.  After 1980, one had to reinterpret any depression as major depression, and the move to widespread antidepressant usage only awaited drugs which were safe in overdose, the first of which was Prozac.  Now with a decade of research, I would say that we can conclude that antidepressants have little if any efficacy in neurotic (or mild) depression, justifying a return to using that diagnostic label so as to differentiate those with depression severe enough to need antidepressants from those who do not benefit for their mild symptoms.  Barber seems to be approximating this same conclusion, though with cultural critique as his main method, and the profession of psychiatry as his primary target. 

On the other hand, despite the emphasis in the second half of the book on psychotherapies like cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), motivational interviewing (MI), and stages of change (SC), I do not believe that  the evidence is there that these psychotherapies actually improve neurotic depression either. 

Another theme is Barber's endorsement of the "recovery" approach to mental illness, as opposed to the medical model.  The recovery approach has its origins in the 12 step movements in substance abuse and in the rehabilitation world.  The recovery model is driven by the person while the medical model is seen as driven by the doctor.  While not inherently opposed to the "medical model" in the sense that medications can be part of managing symptoms, it has been my observation that many proponents of the recovery model are explicitly anti-psychiatry, seeing professionals like psychiatrists as problems or obstacles. If recovery is defined as taking medications to treat disease and then to realize that the patient is also a person and thus requires attention to social context and personal meaning, then there is little to criticize.  Indeed William Osler's medical humanism model, it seems to me, captures much of that approach.  If however, the diagnosis and treatment of disease is put aside altogether, in place of whatever the person with the symptoms wants to do, then the medical profession has a problem.  The Hippocratic/Oslerian tradition is about taking seriously the responsibility to diagnose and treat disease appropriately in the interests of the patient.  Sometimes the interest of the patient is not same as the stated wish of the patient. I will tell my patients frequently: My job is not to make you feel good, it is to make you well. Barber and other proponents of the recovery model will reach some of the same conclusions as I do: for instance, with my Hippocratic medical model, I will not give amphetamines to someone who simply wants it.  But talk of replacing the medical model with the recovery approach may not be as straightforwardly sensible as it might seem at first glance.

The final chapter reviews recent evidence about neuroplasticity, especially the work of Eric Kandel, supporting the view that psychotherapy can result in neuronal changes.  Widely known among psychiatrists, these ideas may be novel to the general public.  Though important and relevant, there is some irony, in a critique of biological psychiatry, to seek support for psychotherapy based on its neurobiological effects.

After finishing the book, I found that an op-ed piece by the author in the Washington Post provided something new:  The author suffers from obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), severe enough to drop out of college.  He recovered with medications, along with psychotherapy.  In an NPR interview, he seemed to downplay his own experience taking SRIs.  But readers might have benefited from some discussion of his own personal experience using SRIs, as opposed to the more abstract anti-medication tone of much of the book.

To sum up the book's argument in practical terms:  For mild depression, use medications less, psychotherapy more -- a simple message, with which I agree. But the matter can be oversimplified, and there is some danger, indeed a probability, that anti-psychiatry activists and their fellow-travelers will draw extremist conclusions based on some of the material presented in this book.  Nuance cannot be ignored:  Psychiatry should not be all about biology, but the era of psychotherapeutic hegemony arguably was worse; and "recovery" may be nothing but a reaction to the confusions of our current confused eclecticism.  Especially given the author's own experience with antidepressants, a purely anti-biological chorus fails to satisfy.  The book's postscript, however, where Barber draws on the ideas of the writer Walker Percy, well captures the complexities involved.   Let psychiatry become more aware of the mystery of human existence, and corresponding humble; and let psychiatry's critics do the same.

© 2008 Nassir Ghaemi

Nassir Ghaemi, M.D., M.A., M.P.H., Director, Mood Disorders Program, Tufts Medical Center, Dept of Psychiatry. Dr. Ghaemi is author of The Concepts of Psychiatry: A Pluralistic Approach to the Mind and Mental Illness, Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003.


Welcome to Metapsychology.

Note that Metapsychology will be moving to a new server in January 2020. We will not put up new reviews during the transition. We thank you for your support and look forward to coming back with a revised format.

We feature over 8300 in-depth reviews of a wide range of books and DVDs written by our reviewers from many backgrounds and perspectives. We update our front page weekly and add more than twenty new reviews each month. Our editor is Christian Perring, PhD. To contact him, use one of the forms available here.

Metapsychology Online reviewers normally receive gratis review copies of the items they review.
Metapsychology Online receives a commission from for purchases through this site, which helps us send review copies to reviewers. Please support us by making your purchases through our Amazon links. We thank you for your support!

Join our Google Group!

Interested in becoming a book reviewer for Metapsychology? To apply, write to our editor.

Metapsychology Online Reviews

Promote your Page too

Metapsychology Online Reviews
ISSN 1931-5716