Genetics and Evolution

 email page    print page

All Topic Reviews
A Companion to GenethicsA Companion to GenethicsA Cooperative SpeciesA Mind So RareA Natural History of RapeAcquiring GenomesAdapting MindsAgeing, Health and CareAlas, Poor DarwinAn Introduction to Evolutionary EthicsAncient Bodies, Modern LivesAnimal ArchitectsAping MankindAre We Hardwired?Bang!BehavingBeyond EvolutionBeyond GeneticsBlood MattersBody BazaarBoneBrain Evolution and CognitionBrain StormBrave New BrainBrave New WorldsChoosing ChildrenCloneCloningConceptual Issues in Evolutionary BiologyConsciousness EvolvingContemporary Debates in Philosophy of BiologyControlling Our DestiniesCooperation and Its EvolutionCreatures of AccidentDarwin Loves YouDarwin's Brave New WorldDarwin's Gift to Science and ReligionDarwin's UniverseDarwin's WormsDarwinian ConservatismDarwinian PsychiatryDarwinism and its DiscontentsDarwinism as ReligionDebating DesignDecoding DarknessDefenders of the TruthDo We Still Need Doctors?Doubting Darwin?Early WarningEngineering the Human GermlineEnhancing EvolutionEnoughEntwined LivesEthical Issues in Human CloningEthical Issues in the New GeneticsEvil GenesEvolutionEvolutionEvolution and Human BehaviorEvolution and Human BehaviorEvolution and Human Sexual BehaviorEvolution and LearningEvolution and ReligionEvolution and the Human MindEvolution in MindEvolution, Gender, and RapeEvolution: The Modern SynthesisEvolutionary Ethics and Contemporary BiologyEvolutionary Origins of MoralityEvolutionary PsychiatryEvolutionary PsychologyEvolutionary Psychology and ViolenceEvolutionary Psychology as Maladapted PsychologyExploding the Gene MythFaces of Huntington'sFlesh of My FleshFrom Chance to ChoiceFrom Darwin to HitlerGenesGenes in ConflictGenes on the CouchGenes, Environment, and PsychopathologyGenes, Environment, and PsychopathologyGenes, Women, EqualityGenetic Nature/CultureGenetic PoliticsGenetic ProspectsGenetic ProspectsGenetic SecretsGenetics in the MadhouseGenetics of Criminal and Antisocial BehaviourGenetics of Mental DisordersGenetics of Original SinGenetics of Original SinGenomeGenomeGenome: Updated EditionGenomes and What to Make of ThemGlowing GenesHow Women Got Their Curves and Other Just-So StoriesHuman CloningHuman Evolution, Reproduction, and MoralityImproving Nature?In Our Own ImageIn Pursuit of the GeneIn the Name of GodIngenious GenesInheritanceInside the Human GenomeInside the O'BriensIntegrating Evolution and DevelopmentIntelligence, Race, and GeneticsIs Human Nature Obsolete?Language OriginsLess Than HumanLiberal EugenicsLiving with Our GenesMaking Genes, Making WavesMaking Sense of EvolutionMan As The PrayerMean GenesMenMood GenesMoral OriginsMothers and OthersNature Via NurtureNever Let Me GoNot By Genes AloneOf Flies, Mice, and MenOn the Origin of StoriesOrigin of MindOrigins of Human NatureOrigins of PsychopathologyOur Posthuman FuturePhilosophy of BiologyPlaying God?Playing God?Portraits of Huntington'sPrimates and PhilosophersPromiscuityPsychiatric Genetics and GenomicsPsychologyQuality of Life and Human DifferenceRe-creating MedicineRedesigning HumansResearch Advances in Genetics and GenomicsResponsible GeneticsResponsible GeneticsScience, Seeds and CyborgsSex and WarSociological Perspectives on the New GeneticsStrange BedfellowsStrange BehaviorSubjects of the WorldSubordination and DefeatThe Age of EmpathyThe Agile GeneThe Ape and the Sushi MasterThe Biotech CenturyThe Blank SlateThe Book of LifeThe Boy Who Loved Too MuchThe Bridge to HumanityThe Case Against PerfectionThe Case for PerfectionThe Case of the Female OrgasmThe Century of the GeneThe Common ThreadThe Concept of the Gene in Development and EvolutionThe Debated MindThe Double-Edged HelixThe Epidemiology of SchizophreniaThe Ethics of Choosing ChildrenThe Ethics of Human CloningThe Evolution of CooperationThe Evolution of MindThe Evolution of MindThe Evolved ApprenticeThe Evolving WorldThe Extended Selfish GeneThe Fact of EvolutionThe Folly of FoolsThe Future of Human NatureThe God GeneThe Immortal Life of Henrietta LacksThe Impact of the GeneThe Innate MindThe Innate MindThe Innate Mind: Volume 3The Limits and Lies of Human Genetic ResearchThe Lives of the BrainThe Maladapted MindThe Meme MachineThe Misunderstood GeneThe Moral, Social, and Commercial Imperatives of Genetic Testing and ScreeningThe Most Dangerous AnimalThe New Genetic MedicineThe Nurture AssumptionThe Origin and Evolution of CulturesThe Origins of FairnessThe Paradoxical PrimateThe Perfect BabyThe Robot's RebellionThe Selfish GeneThe Shape of ThoughtThe Shattered SelfThe Stem Cell ControversyThe Story WithinThe Stuff of LifeThe Talking ApeThe Temperamental ThreadThe Terrible GiftThe Theory of OptionsThe Top 10 Myths About EvolutionThe Triple HelixThe Triumph of SociobiologyThe Woman Who Walked into the SeaTwinsUnderstanding CloningUnderstanding the GenomeUnnatural SelectionUnto OthersUp From DragonsVoracious Science and Vulnerable AnimalsWar Against the WeakWhat Genes Can't DoWhat It Means to Be 98 Percent ChimpanzeeWho Owns YouWhose View of Life?Why Evolution Is TrueWhy Think? WondergenesWrestling with Behavioral GeneticsYour Genetic Destiny

Related Topics
The Century of the GeneReview - The Century of the Gene
by Evelyn Fox Keller
Harvard University Press, 2000
Review by John Collier, Ph.D.
May 15th 2002 (Volume 6, Issue 20)

As the title suggests, Keller argues in this short book that the gene has had its century, and it is time for biology to focus on broader issues. This is not to say that genes are not important; Keller is very clear that they are. However, the very research that has tried to establish exactly what genes do has uncovered complications, conceptual ambiguities, and non-genetic factors that violate the simplifying assumptions that came to guide gene research from the middle of the 20th Century. Contrary to some critical reviews of this book, Keller is not critical of genetic research in itself; more often, she praises it. She argues very strongly, however, that genetic research has shown conclusively that the gene is not what it used to be. Her main point is that the very success of genetics has (or should) teach us humility. A subsidiary point is that the rapid changes in genetics have left us with a heritage of inadequate concepts, specialised practices with little theoretical integration, and a residue of inadequate but widely accepted ideas of what genes are. Scientists working in each of these specialised fields know what they are doing, and how they understand and apply the concepts of genetics, but there is no genetic lingua franca. Unfortunately, given the social importance of genetics, past and current discourse about genes leaves the public with the opposite impression. If nothing else, this book is an antidote to that (possibly dangerous) impression.

The exposition of the book is historical. The history is a brief synopsis of highlights, and the triumphs of genetic research are perhaps given less space than many would like, whereas the problems with the gene concept and with simple views of genetic determination are emphasised. Given the large number of histories that put the triumphs of genetic research front and centre, Keller’s emphasis is both warranted and rather refreshing. The book contains a short introduction and conclusion, and four longer chapters that are arranged both historically and thematically.

The first chapter deals with the regulation of genetic stability. This is the basis for the functionality of the gene as a unit of heredity. It turns out that the gene is not stable enough on its own, and needs help. Part of this help comes from genetically controlled processes, but not all. Still, this leaves the gene as the central actor in the determination of traits, though it needs its dressers and perhaps even its directors.

The second chapter deals with the issue of what genes do. If the gene is a functional unit that that is responsible for heredity, then it determines heritable traits in the cell and the whole organism, and can replicate and transmit this capacity for determination from cell to cell and from organism to organism. Or at least that was the first version. The discovery of the structure of DNA and the genetic code confirmed earlier observations that DNA was the locus of inheritance, and that one gene coded for one enzyme (functional protein). Keller quotes Francis Crick, “DNA makes RNA, RNA makes proteins, and proteins make us”. Subsequent discoveries in genetics have shown this to be a bit of an exaggeration. Keller describes several major modifications in this “Central Dogma”. First, some DNA regulates other DNA. Second, the RNA transcribed is edited, and many sections of DNA have multiple mappings onto proteins. If segments of DNA are the units of heredity, then the units of heredity are not the genes in terms of developmental function, and vice versa. Sometimes the two coincide, and these cases are important, but they are far from being the rule. Nonetheless, much popular opinion, and even much science, works as if the Central Dogma were Nature’s own Truth.

The next chapter deals with the concept of a genetic program. This chapter shows how this somewhat more sophisticated notion of gene activity is supposed to work, and some of the problems it encounters. The most obvious one is that the way a program works depends on the type of machine it runs on. It turns out that there are both surprising similarities across diverse kinds of organism, and surprising divergences in similar organisms. The idea that the genes are a blueprint for making an organism is both disarmingly accurate where certain genes that govern eye development in flies lead to mouse eyes when transplanted to mice, and dismayingly inaccurate when we look at the genetic details of an organism as simple as the roundworm, C. elegans. 

Turning to development, and developmental stability, Keller points to the role of organisation and redundancy. Both imply no simple relation between genes and traits. Unlike current computer programs, small variations (and even some large ones) have little effect on the end result. It is interesting that IBM has recently started a program to develop systems that have the sort of autonomy that we see in organisms. Perhaps the program metaphor will become accurate eventually.

The conclusion is a rumination on why we still talk of genes, given the problems. Keller suggests that gene talk is more of a hindrance to the understanding of lay people than of scientists, since the latter typically know what they are talking about, and by and large can compensate for inadequacies in gene discourse. Unfortunately, the “land rush” engendered by genomics has, if anything, led to an even more unwarranted focus on genes, whatever they are. The advantages of laying claim to a segment of DNA are too great to allow time to contemplate complicating details, such as underdetermination or overdetermination of physiological function. Economic decisions are considerably less corrigible than scientific ones.

In any case, the Central Dogma encourages the idea, often reported in the news, of the gene for X. The problems with the Central Dogma are the problems with the notion of a gene for X. Science reporters should read Keller’s book carefully, and digest its message fully. Failing this (and given that with few exceptions reporters report what they think scientists have said, rather than the science itself, it will fail), one can hope that people of influence who read those reports will have read Keller’s book, so they are not so easily swayed by the heroic archetype of the gene.


© 2002 John Collier


John Collier is a Visiting Scientist at the Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research. His work is in foundations of information theory, autonomy, evolutionary theory and theory change, as well as various papers in metaphysics and the philosophy of physics. He is currently working on a book on reduction in complex systems with C.A. Hooker.


Welcome to Metapsychology. We feature over 8200 in-depth reviews of a wide range of books and DVDs written by our reviewers from many backgrounds and perspectives. We update our front page weekly and add more than twenty new reviews each month. Our editor is Christian Perring, PhD. To contact him, use one of the forms available here.

Metapsychology Online reviewers normally receive gratis review copies of the items they review.
Metapsychology Online receives a commission from for purchases through this site, which helps us send review copies to reviewers. Please support us by making your purchases through our Amazon links. We thank you for your support!

Join our e-mail list!: Metapsychology New Review Announcements: Sent out monthly, these announcements list our recent reviews. To subscribe, click here.

Interested in becoming a book reviewer for Metapsychology? To apply, write to our editor.

Metapsychology Online Reviews

Promote your Page too

Metapsychology Online Reviews
ISSN 1931-5716