email page print pageAll Topic Reviews
Anger and Forgiveness"Are You There Alone?"10 Good Questions about Life and DeathA Casebook of Ethical Challenges in NeuropsychologyA Companion to BioethicsA Companion to BioethicsA Companion to GenethicsA Companion to GenethicsA Companion to Muslim EthicsA Cooperative SpeciesA Critique of the Moral Defense of VegetarianismA Delicate BalanceA Life for a LifeA Life-Centered Approach to BioethicsA Matter of SecurityA Natural History of Human MoralityA Philosophical DiseaseA Practical Guide to Clinical Ethics ConsultingA Question of TrustA Sentimentalist Theory of the MindA Short Stay in SwitzerlandA Very Bad WizardA World Without ValuesAction and ResponsibilityAction Theory, Rationality and CompulsionActs of ConscienceAddiction and ResponsibilityAddiction NeuroethicsAdvance Directives in Mental HealthAfter HarmAftermathAgainst AutonomyAgainst BioethicsAgainst HealthAgainst Moral ResponsibilityAgency and AnswerabilityAgency and ResponsibilityAgency, Freedom, and Moral ResponsibilityAging, Biotechnology, and the FutureAlbert Schweitzer's Reverence for LifeAlphavilleAltruismAmerican EugenicsAmerican PsychosisAn Anthology of Psychiatric EthicsAn Introduction to EthicsAn Introduction to Evolutionary EthicsAn Introduction to Kant's Moral Philosophy And a Time to DieAnimal LessonsAnimal RightsAnimals Like UsApplied Ethics in Mental Health CareAre Women Human?Aristotle on Practical WisdomAristotle's Ethics and Moral ResponsibilityAssisted Suicide and the Right to DieAutonomyAutonomy and the Challenges to LiberalismAutonomy, Consent and the LawBabies by DesignBackslidingBad PharmaBad SoulsBasic Desert, Reactive Attitudes and Free WillBeauty JunkiesBefore ForgivingBeing AmoralBeing YourselfBending Over BackwardsBending ScienceBernard WilliamsBetter Humans?Better Than WellBeyond ChoiceBeyond GeneticsBeyond HatredBeyond Humanity?Beyond LossBeyond LossBeyond Moral JudgmentBeyond the DSM StoryBias in Psychiatric DiagnosisBioethicsBioethicsBioethics and the BrainBioethics at the MoviesBioethics Beyond the HeadlinesBioethics Critically ReconsideredBioethics in a Liberal SocietyBioethics in the ClinicBiomedical EthicsBiomedical EthicsBiomedical EthicsBiomedical EthicsBiomedical Research and BeyondBiosBioscience EthicsBipolar ChildrenBluebirdBodies out of BoundsBodies, Commodities, and BiotechnologiesBody BazaarBoundBoundaries and Boundary Violations in PsychoanalysisBraintrustBrandedBreaking the SilenceBuffy the Vampire Slayer and PhilosophyCapital PunishmentCase Studies in Biomedical Research EthicsChallenging the Stigma of Mental IllnessCharacter and Moral Psychology Character as Moral FictionChild Well-BeingChildrenChildren's RightsChoosing ChildrenChoosing Not to ChooseClinical Dilemmas in PsychotherapyClinical EthicsCloningClose toYouCoercion as CureCoercive Treatment in PsychiatryCognition of Value in Aristotle's EthicsCognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy Comfortably NumbCommonsense RebellionCommunicative Action and Rational ChoiceCompetence, Condemnation, and CommitmentComprehending CareConducting Insanity EvaluationsConfidential RelationshipsConfidentiality and Mental HealthConflict of Interest in the ProfessionsConsuming KidsContemporary Debates In Applied EthicsContemporary Debates in Moral TheoryContemporary Debates in Social PhilosophyContentious IssuesContesting PsychiatryCrazy in AmericaCreating CapabilitiesCreatures Like Us?Crime and CulpabilityCrime, Punishment, and Mental IllnessCritical Perspectives in Public HealthCritical PsychiatryCrueltyCultural Assessment in Clinical PsychiatryCutting to the CoreCyborg CitizenDamaged IdentitiesDeaf Identities in the MakingDeath Is That Man Taking NamesDebating Same-Sex MarriageDecision Making, Personhood and DementiaDecoding the Ethics CodeDefining DifferenceDefining Right and Wrong in Brain ScienceDefining the Beginning and End of LifeDelusions of GenderDementiaDemocracy in What State?Demons of the Modern WorldDescriptions and PrescriptionsDesert and VirtueDesire, Practical Reason, and the GoodDestructive Trends in Mental HealthDid My Neurons Make Me Do It?Difference and IdentityDigital HemlockDigital SoulDignityDisability BioethicsDisability, Difference, DiscriminationDisordered Personalities and CrimeDisorders of VolitionDisorientation and Moral LifeDivided Minds and Successive SelvesDoes Feminism Discriminate against Men?Does Torture Work?Double Standards in Medical Research in Developing CountriesDrugs and JusticeDworkin and His CriticsDying in the Twenty-First CenturyEarly WarningEconomics and Youth ViolenceEmbodied RhetoricsEmerging Conceptual, Ethical and Policy Issues in BionanotechnologyEmotional ReasonEmotions in the Moral LifeEmotions in the Moral LifeEmpathyEmpathy and Moral DevelopmentEmpathy and MoralityEmpirical Ethics in PsychiatryEncountering NatureEncountering the Sacred in PsychotherapyEngendering International HealthEnhancing EvolutionEnhancing Human CapacitiesEnoughEros and the GoodErotic InnocenceErotic MoralityEssays on Derek Parfit's On What MattersEssays on Free Will and Moral ResponsibilityEthical Choices in Contemporary MedicineEthical Conflicts in PsychologyEthical Dilemmas in PediatricsEthical Issues in Behavioral ResearchEthical Issues in Dementia CareEthical Issues in Forensic Mental Health ResearchEthical Issues in the New GeneticsEthical LifeEthical Reasoning for Mental Health ProfessionalsEthical TheoryEthical WillsEthically Challenged ProfessionsEthicsEthicsEthicsEthics and AnimalsEthics and ScienceEthics and the A PrioriEthics and the Discovery of the UnconsciousEthics and the Metaphysics of MedicineEthics at the CinemaEthics Case Book of the American Psychoanalytic AssociationEthics Done RightEthics ExpertiseEthics for EveryoneEthics for PsychologistsEthics for the New MillenniumEthics in CyberspaceEthics in Health CareEthics In Health Services ManagementEthics in Mental Health ResearchEthics in PracticeEthics in PsychiatryEthics in PsychologyEthics in Psychotherapy and CounselingEthics of PsychiatryEthics without OntologyEthics, Culture, and PsychiatryEthics, Sexual Orientation, and Choices about ChildrenEvaluating the Science and Ethics of Research on HumansEvilEvil GenesEvil in Modern ThoughtEvil in Modern ThoughtEvolution, Gender, and RapeEvolutionary Ethics and Contemporary BiologyEvolutionary Psychology and ViolenceEvolved MoralityExperiments in EthicsExploding the Gene MythExploiting ChildhoodFacing Human SufferingFact and ValueFaking ItFalse-Memory Creation in Children and AdultsFat ShameFatal FreedomFellow-Feeling and the Moral LifeFeminism and Its DiscontentsFeminist Ethics and Social and Political PhilosophyFeminist TheoryFinal ExamFirst Do No HarmFirst, Do No HarmFlashpointFlesh WoundsForced to CareForgivenessForgivenessForgiveness and LoveForgiveness and ReconciliationForgiveness and RetributionFoucault and the Government of DisabilityFoundational Issues in Human Brain MappingFoundations of Forensic Mental Health AssessmentFree WillFree Will And Moral ResponsibilityFree Will and Reactive AttitudesFree Will, Agency, and Meaning in LifeFree?Freedom and ValueFreedom vs. InterventionFriendshipFrom Darwin to HitlerFrom Disgust to HumanityFrom Enlightenment to ReceptivityFrom Morality to Mental HealthFrom Silence to VoiceFrontiers of JusticeGender in the MirrorGenetic PoliticsGenetic ProspectsGenetic ProspectsGenetics of Original SinGenetics of Original SinGenocide's AftermathGetting RealGluttonyGood WorkGoodness & AdviceGreedGroups in ConflictGrowing Up GirlGut FeminismHabilitation, Health, and AgencyHandbook for Health Care Ethics CommitteesHandbook of BioethicsHandbook of PsychopathyHappinessHappiness and the Good LifeHappiness Is OverratedHard FeelingsHard LuckHardwired BehaviorHarmful ThoughtsHeal & ForgiveHealing PsychiatryHealth Care Ethics for PsychologistsHeterosyncraciesHistorical and Philosophical Perspectives on Biomedical EthicsHoly WarHookedHookedHow Can I Be Trusted?How Propaganda WorksHow to Do Things with Pornography How to Make Opportunity EqualHow Universities Can Help Create a Wiser WorldHow We HopeHow We Think About DementiaHuman BondingHuman EnhancementHuman GoodnessHuman Identity and BioethicsHuman TrialsHumanism, What's That?Humanitarian ReasonHumanityHumanizing MadnessI am Not Sick I Don't Need Help!I Was WrongIdentifying Hyperactive ChildrenIf That Ever Happens to MeImproving Nature?In Defense of FloggingIn Defense of SinIn Love With LifeIn Our Own ImageIn the FamilyIn the Land of the DeafIn the Name of IdentityIn the Wake of 9/11In Two MindsInformed Consent in Medical ResearchInnovation in Medical TechnologyInside Assisted LivingInside EthicsIntelligence, Race, and GeneticsIntensive CareIs Human Nature Obsolete?Is Long-Term Therapy Unethical?Is There a Duty to Die?Is There an Ethicist in the House?Issues in Philosophical CounselingJudging Children As ChildrenJust a DogJust BabiesJust CareJustice for ChildrenJustice for HedgehogsJustice in RobesJustice, Luck, and KnowledgeJustifiable ConductKant on Moral AutonomyKant's Theory of VirtueKids of CharacterKilling McVeighLack of CharacterLack of CharacterLaw and the BrainLearning About School ViolenceLeaving YouLectures on the History of Political PhilosophyLegal and Ethical Aspects of HealthcareLegal Aspects of Mental CapacityLegal ConceptionsLegalizing ProstitutionLet Them Eat ProzacLevelling the Playing FieldLiberal Education in a Knowledge SocietyLiberal EugenicsLife After FaithLife at the BottomLife, Sex, and IdeasListening to the WhispersLiving ProfessionalismLosing Matt ShepardLostLuckyMad in AmericaMad PrideMadhouseMaking Another World PossibleMaking Babies, Making FamiliesMaking Genes, Making WavesMaking Sense of Freedom and ResponsibilityMalignantMasculinity Studies and Feminist TheoryMeaning and Moral OrderMeaning in LifeMeaning in Life and Why It MattersMeans, Ends, and PersonsMeans, Ends, and PersonsMedical Enhancement and PosthumanityMedical Research for HireMedicalized MasculinitiesMedically Assisted DeathMeditations for the HumanistMelancholia and MoralismMental Health Professionals, Minorities and the PoorMental Illness, Medicine and LawMerit, Meaning, and Human BondageMetaethical SubjectivismMill's UtilitarianismMind FieldsMind WarsMind WarsModern Theories of JusticeModernity and TechnologyMoney ShotMonsterMoral Acquaintances and Moral DecisionsMoral ClarityMoral CultivationMoral Development and RealityMoral Dilemmas in Real LifeMoral DimensionsMoral EntanglementsMoral FailureMoral LiteracyMoral MachinesMoral MindsMoral OriginsMoral Panics, Sex PanicsMoral ParticularismMoral PerceptionMoral PsychologyMoral Psychology: Volume IVMoral RealismMoral RelativismMoral RepairMoral Responsibility and Alternative PossibilitiesMoral Status and Human LifeMoral StealthMoral Theory at the MoviesMoral TribesMoral Value and Human DiversityMoral, Immoral, AmoralMoralismMorality and Self-InterestMorality in a Natural WorldMorality, Moral Luck and ResponsibilityMorals, Rights and Practice in the Human ServicesMorals, Rights and Practice in the Human ServicesMore Than HumanMotive and RightnessMovies and the Moral Adventure of LifeMurder in the InnMy Body PoliticMy Brain Made Me Do ItMy Sister's KeeperMy Sister's KeeperMy WayNano-Bio-EthicsNarrative MedicineNarrative ProsthesisNatural Ethical FactsNatural-Born CybogsNaturalized BioethicsNeither Bad nor MadNeoconservatismNeonatal BioethicsNeurobiology and the Development of Human MoralityNeuroethicsNeuroethicsNeuroethicsNew Takes in Film-PhilosophyNew Waves in EthicsNew Waves in MetaethicsNietzsche on Ethics and PoliticsNo Child Left DifferentNo Impact ManNormative EthicsNormativityNothing about us, without us!Oath BetrayedOf War and LawOn ApologyOn Being AuthenticOn EvilOn Human RightsOn The Stigma Of Mental IllnessOn the TakeOn Virtue EthicsOn What MattersOn What We Owe to Each OtherOne ChildOne Nation Under TherapyOne World NowOne World NowOur Bodies, Whose Property?Our Bodies, Whose Property?Our Daily MedsOur Faithfulness to the PastOur Posthuman FutureOut of EdenOut of Its MindOut of the ShadowsOverdosed AmericaOxford Handbook of Psychiatric EthicsOxford Textbook of Philosophy of PsychiatryPassionate DeliberationPatient Autonomy and the Ethics of ResponsibilityPC, M.D.Perfecting VirtuePersonal AutonomyPersonal Autonomy in SocietyPersonal Identity and EthicsPersonhood and Health CarePersons, Humanity, and the Definition of DeathPerspectives On Health And Human RightsPharmacracyPharmageddonPhilosophy and This Actual WorldPhilosophy of BiologyPhilosophy of Technology: The Technological ConditionPhysician-Assisted DyingPicturing DisabilityPilgrim at Tinker CreekPlaying God?Playing God?Political EmotionsPornlandPowerful MedicinesPractical Autonomy and BioethicsPractical EthicsPractical Ethics for PsychologistsPractical RulesPragmatic BioethicsPragmatic BioethicsPragmatic NeuroethicsPraise and BlamePreferences and Well-BeingPrimates and PhilosophersPro-Life, Pro-ChoiceProcreation and ParenthoodProfits Before People?Progress in BioethicsProperty in the BodyProzac As a Way of LifeProzac on the CouchPsychiatric Aspects of Justification, Excuse and Mitigation in Anglo-American Criminal Law Psychiatric EthicsPsychiatry and EmpirePsychological Concepts and Biological PsychiatryPsychology and Consumer CulturePsychology and LawPsychotropic Drug Prescriber's Survival GuidePublic Health LawPublic Health Law and EthicsPublic PhilosophyPunishing the Mentally IllPunishmentPursuits of WisdomPutting Morality Back Into PoliticsPutting on VirtueQuality of Life and Human DifferenceRaceRadical HopeRadical VirtuesRape Is RapeRe-creating MedicineRe-Engineering Philosophy for Limited BeingsReason's GriefReasonably ViciousReckoning With HomelessnessReconceiving Medical EthicsRecovery from SchizophreniaRedefining RapeRedesigning HumansReducing the Stigma of Mental IllnessReflections On How We LiveReframing Disease ContextuallyRefusing CareRefuting Peter Singer's Ethical TheoryRelative JusticeRelativism and Human RightsReligion ExplainedReprogeneticsRescuing JeffreyResponsibilityResponsibility and PsychopathyResponsibility and PunishmentResponsibility and PunishmentResponsibility from the MarginsResponsible GeneticsRethinking CommodificationRethinking Informed Consent in BioethicsRethinking Mental Health and DisorderRethinking RapeReturn to ReasonRevolution in PsychologyRightsRights, Democracy, and Fulfillment in the Era of Identity PoliticsRisk and Luck in Medical EthicsRobert NozickRousseau and the Dilemmas of Modernity Rule of Law, Misrule of MenRun, Spot, RunRunning on RitalinSatisficing and MaximizingSchizophrenia, Culture, and SubjectivityScience and EthicsScience in the Private InterestScience, Policy, and the Value-Free IdealScience, Seeds and CyborgsScratching the Surface of BioethicsSecular Philosophy and the Religious TemperamentSeeing the LightSelf-ConstitutionSelf-Made MadnessSelf-Trust and Reproductive AutonomySentimental RulesSex Fiends, Perverts, and PedophilesSex OffendersSexual DevianceSexual EthicsSexual PredatorsSexualized BrainsShaping Our SelvesShock TherapyShould I Medicate My Child?ShunnedSick to Death and Not Going to Take It AnymoreSickoSide EffectsSidewalk StoriesSister CitizenSkeptical FeminismSocial Inclusion of People with Mental IllnessSocial JusticeSociological Perspectives on the New GeneticsSome We Love, Some We Hate, Some We EatSovereign VirtueSpiral of EntrapmentSplit DecisionsSticks and StonesStories MatterSubjectivity and Being SomebodySuffering, Death, and IdentitySuicide ProhibitionSurgery JunkiesSurgically Shaping ChildrenTaking Morality SeriouslyTaming the Troublesome ChildTechnology and the Good Life?TestimonyText and Materials on International Human RightsThe Aims of Higher EducationThe Almost MoonThe Altruistic BrainThe American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Forensic PsychiatryThe Animal ManifestoThe Art of LivingThe Autonomy of MoralityThe Beloved SelfThe Best Things in LifeThe Big FixThe Bioethics ReaderThe Biology and Psychology of Moral AgencyThe Blackwell Guide to Medical EthicsThe Body SilentThe BondThe Book of LifeThe Burden of SympathyThe Cambridge Companion to Virtue EthicsThe Cambridge Companion to Virtue EthicsThe Cambridge Textbook of BioethicsThe Case against Assisted SuicideThe Case Against PerfectionThe Case Against PunishmentThe Case for PerfectionThe Case of Terri SchiavoThe Challenge of Human RightsThe Code for Global EthicsThe Colonization Of Psychic SpaceThe Commercialization of Intimate LifeThe Common ThreadThe Connected SelfThe Constitution of AgencyThe Creation of PsychopharmacologyThe Criminal BrainThe Decency WarsThe Difficult-to-Treat Psychiatric PatientThe Disability PendulumThe Disability Rights Movement: From Charity to ConfrontationThe Domain of ReasonsThe Double-Edged HelixThe Duty to ProtectThe Emotional Construction of MoralsThe End of Ethics in a Technological SocietyThe End of Stigma?The Essentials of New York Mental Health LawThe Ethical BrainThe Ethical Dimensions of the Biological and Health SciencesThe Ethics of BioethicsThe Ethics of ParenthoodThe Ethics of SightseeingThe Ethics of the FamilyThe Ethics of the LieThe Ethics of TransplantsThe Ethics ToolkitThe Evolution of Mental Health LawThe Evolution of MoralityThe FamilyThe Fat Studies ReaderThe Forgiveness ProjectThe Form of Practical KnowledgeThe Fountain of YouthThe Freedom ParadoxThe Future of Assisted Suicide and EuthanasiaThe Future of Human NatureThe Good BookThe Good LifeThe Great BetrayalThe Handbook of Disability StudiesThe Healing VirtuesThe High Price of MaterialismThe History of Human RightsThe HorizonThe Idea of JusticeThe Ideal of NatureThe Illusion of Freedom and EqualityThe Immortal Life of Henrietta LacksThe Importance of Being UnderstoodThe Insanity OffenseThe Joy of SecularismThe Language PoliceThe Last Normal ChildThe Last UtopiaThe Limits of MedicineThe LobotomistThe Love CureThe Lucifer EffectThe Manual of EpictetusThe Mark of ShameThe Meaning of NiceThe Medicalization of SocietyThe Merck DruggernautThe Mind Has MountainsThe Modern Art of DyingThe Modern SavageThe Moral ArcThe Moral BrainThe Moral Demands of MemoryThe Moral FoolThe Moral MindThe Moral Psychology HandbookThe Moral, Social, and Commercial Imperatives of Genetic Testing and ScreeningThe Most Good You Can DoThe Myth of ChoiceThe Myth of the Moral BrainThe Nature of NormativityThe New Disability HistoryThe New Genetic MedicineThe New Religious IntoleranceThe Offensive InternetThe Origins of FairnessThe Oxford Handbook of Animal EthicsThe Oxford Handbook of Ethics at the End of LifeThe Perfect BabyThe Philosophy of NeedThe Philosophy of PornographyThe Philosophy of PsychiatryThe Politics Of LustThe Portable Ethicist for Mental Health Professionals The Power of Religion in the Public SphereThe Price of PerfectionThe Price of TruthThe Problem of PunishmentThe Prosthetic ImpulseThe Psychology of Good and EvilThe Psychology of Good and EvilThe PsychopathThe Purity MythThe Pursuit of PerfectionThe Relevance of Philosophy to LifeThe Right Road to Radical FreedomThe Right to Be ParentsThe Righteous MindThe Root of All EvilThe Rules of InsanityThe Second SexismThe Second-Person StandpointThe Silent World of Doctor and PatientThe Sleep of ReasonThe Social Psychology of Good and EvilThe Social Psychology of MoralityThe Social Psychology of MoralityThe Speed of DarkThe Stem Cell ControversyThe Stem Cell ControversyThe Story of Cruel and UnusualThe Story WithinThe Stubborn System of Moral ResponsibilityThe Suicide TouristThe Terrible GiftThe Theory of OptionsThe Therapy of DesireThe Trauma of Psychological TortureThe Trauma of Psychological TortureThe Triple HelixThe Trolley Problem MysteriesThe Trouble with DiversityThe Truth About the Drug CompaniesThe Ugly LawsThe Varieties of Religious ExperienceThe Virtue of Defiance and Psychiatric EngagementThe Virtues of HappinessThe Virtuous Life in Greek EthicsThe Virtuous PsychiatristThe Voice of Breast Cancer in Medicine and BioethicsThe War Against BoysThe War for Children's MindsThe Whole ChildThe Woman RacketThe Worldwide Practice of TortureTherapy with ChildrenThieves of VirtueThree Generations, No ImbecilesTimes of Triumph, Times of DoubtTolerance Among The VirtuesTolerance and the Ethical LifeTolerationToxic PsychiatryTrauma, Truth and ReconciliationTreatment Kind and FairTrusting on the EdgeTry to RememberUltimate JudgementUnborn in the USA: Inside the War on AbortionUndermining ScienceUnderstanding AbortionUnderstanding CloningUnderstanding EmotionsUnderstanding EvilUnderstanding Moral ObligationUnderstanding Physician-Pharmaceutical Industry InteractionsUnderstanding TerrorismUnderstanding the GenomeUnderstanding the Stigma of Mental IllnessUnderstanding Treatment Without ConsentUnhingedUnprincipled VirtueUnsanctifying Human Life: Essays on EthicsUnspeakable Acts, Ordinary PeopleUp in FlamesUpheavals of ThoughtUsers and Abusers of PsychiatryValue-Free Science?Values and Psychiatric DiagnosisValues in ConflictVegetarianismViolence and Mental DisorderVirtue EthicsVirtue, Rules, and JusticeVirtue, Vice, and PersonalityVirtues and Their VicesWar Against the WeakWar, Torture and TerrorismWarrior's DishonourWeaknessWelfare and Rational CareWhat Genes Can't DoWhat Have We DoneWhat Is a Human?What Is Good and WhyWhat Is Good and WhyWhat Is the Good Life?What Price Better Health?What Should I Do?What We Owe to Each OtherWhat Would Aristotle Do?What's Good on TVWhat's Normal?What's Wrong with Children's RightsWhat's Wrong with Homosexuality?What's Wrong With Morality?When Is Discrimination Wrong?Who Holds the Moral High Ground?Who Owns YouWho Qualifies for Rights?Whose America?Whose View of Life?Why Animals MatterWhy Animals MatterWhy I Burned My Book and Other Essays on DisabilityWhy Not Kill Them All?Why Punish? How Much?Why Some Things Should Not Be for SaleWisdom, Intuition and EthicsWithout ConscienceWomen and Borderline Personality DisorderWomen and MadnessWondergenesWould You Kill the Fat Man?Wrestling with Behavioral GeneticsWriting About PatientsYou Must Be DreamingYour Genetic DestinyYour Inner FishYouth Offending and Youth Justice Yuck!
The world (especially the wealthy western world) is dominated by meat-eaters. How can a vegetarian make her point ? Carol Adams once insisted (in The Sexual Politics of Meat. A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory, Continuum, 1995)that the voice of a vegetarian is primarily silenced, especially when it comes to sharing a dinner with meat-eaters. Moral Veggies have now reasons to believe that their predicament is far better: silence is no more unavoidable. An huge quantity of arguments and moral theories to the effect that one should abstain from meat-eating flooded philosophy (especially applied ethics, though not only) since Singer and Regan issued their influential books.
The book written by Kerry Walters offers a short, readable and handy presentation of major strategies of defense of ethical vegetarianism. The style is clear. No technical phrases. Arguments and references are clearly stated. It is intended for general readers, but it may help lecturers who are willing to offer courses about food ethics, applied ethics and environmental issues. In particular, no special background-knowledge is needed to follow the arguments.
As such, it qualifies as an handbook for graduates students (especially second and third year). Though, as I just hinted, general readers, especially vegetarians wishing to back their dietary choices with strong arguments or to deepen their ethical stance with the help of philosophical reflection, will greatly enjoy this reading. They may take the book as providing a fairly thorough map of the philosophy of vegetarianism.
Kerry Walters describes seven arguments: the basic argument, the argument from interests, the argument from rights, the ecofeminist argument, the environmental argument, the anthrocentric argument, the reverence for life argument. The author describes each argument in detail, with alternative formulations, its main critics and objections, with the rejoinders.
One chapter is devoted to each argument. The first chapter recalls some basics and facts about animal pain and the appalling truth about factory farms and industrial slaughter.
Each chapter is self-contained, for the author is concerned with never alluding to a point made elsewhere in the book without summing it up.
Nowadays, the book reads as a whole, too.
The basic argument goes like this: (1) it is morally wrong to harm without necessity (to be cruel), whether we are ourselves cruel or that we benefit from acts done with cruelty. (2) Eating meat the way we do implies factory farms. (3) Factory-farmed animals are treated with cruelty.
Therefore, we should abstain from eating meat, or drastically reduce our consumption of meat.
The first statement is controversial. Why is it morally wrong or indecent to harm animals? Those who accept the basic argument without further ado generally found their acceptance on the idea that we are related to some animals (not all of them, but most, if not all, factory-farmed animals) by a relation of interspecifics kinship. It means that we are able to understand their emotions, pains, and so on, as we do for our kin human fellows.
We should then accept that, if we understand why it is morally indecent to harm without necessity one of our fellow humans, we must understand why it is morally indecent to harm one of our fellow creatures (like pigs, cows, ducks...).
If all moral vegetarians are ready to accept the basic argument, a lot of them think that kinship, kindness or empathy are hardly justifications of the claim expressed in the first statement of the basic argument. Regan, for example, has noticed that one does not need to feel empathy in order to act rightly, and, conversely, that kindness is never a warrant of justice or morality. The two levels are separate.
On the other hand, we can accept the idea that, without an ability to relate to what Cora Diamond calls our "fellow creatures", ethical vegetarianism is lacking an important affective dimension, without which ethical reasoning seems shallow. Nowadays, empathy does not allow ethical choices when it comes to difficult cases and dilemmas. And we have to justify on another basis the claim to the effect that it is morally wrong to harm animals.
The six following arguments are essays to justify this claim, for those who would not be satisfied with the prima facie acceptance (invoking kinship and empathy) of the basic argument. We are now going to sketch them briefly, according to the account given by Walters. We do not enter into the details of objections, critics and rejoinders.
The first three arguments (Interests, Rights, Eco-feminism and social) focus on animal welfare, while the other ones (Environment, anthrocentric, Reverence for life) focus on other perspectives (ecology, wealth of mankind, spirituality, whether religious of not).
Among the first three arguments, two are based on sustained rationality (Interests, Rights) while the third one opposes strictly rational arguments, on the claim that strict rationality and cruelty against animals are two sides of the same coin.
The utilitarian defense (Chapter 3) of vegetarianism takes as its core concept interest. Interest is related to experiences and not to individuals. If we take two worlds, and if we count more enjoyable experiences in the world A than in the world B, then it is morally wrong to desire the world B while not desiring the world B. All experiences are valuable, without consideration of their holder (even if human; claiming that human experiences value more is speciesism).
If a creature can suffer, this creature's experiences count: that is the principle of equality.
In a world without factory farms, a huge amount of painful experiences would be avoided, without causing a sum of harm that would exceed the amount of avoided pains, so it would be morally wrong not to desire a world without factory farms. Therefore, we should abstain from eating meat.
Whereas utilitarian ethics concerns itself with experiences only, not taking into account holders (subjects having those experiences), the argument from rights (Chapter 4) whose Tom Regan is the champion, get this perspective upside down. Regan, in effect, focus on holders of experiences (which are pure "receptacles", according to Singer). This choice is not the upshot of an arbitrary metaphysical decision.
Actually, Regan noticed a big flaw in Singer's method, he called the Singer Paradox. If Singer is right, my doing (abstaining from eating meat) is morally justified if World-A (where pains are diminishing because there are no more, or significantly less, factory-farmed animals) comes to reality. And it depends on the decisions of non-vegetarians. If nothing happens (the boycott of meat, eggs and dairy products fails), then we still depend on non-vegetarians, and their craving for meat.
What kind of moral vegetarianism is this, which depends, for its justification, on the very attitude which it morally dismisses? The computation of pleasures and pains is not doing the job. One needs a more principled approach. Moral reasoning does not equate with wagering.
Regan shares with Singer the same point of departure: human beings. The utilitarian concept of pain and interest, is, first, discovered in humans, and then demonstrated in other species. Regan is making the same move, but with another concept: "subject-of-a-life". Regan thinks that some of our rights (a right is defined as much as an entitlement as something that precludes others to do something to the right-owner) are natural, that a creature is endowed with them in virtue of an inherent value she's sharing with other right-owners.
Human beings may not be treated merely as means, because they are "subjects-of-a-life". But there are "subjects-of-a-life" which are not human beings (for example, factory-farmed animals). We must accordingly allow them the same natural rights, in particular, the right to be treated as ends and never merely as simple means.
This principle does not block the possibility to treat differently different kind of creatures, in case of conflicts of interests, but this difference is not part of the ethical principles, but of their applications, with all the relevant contextual cues.
Other defenders of the argument from rights think that the concept of "subject-of-a-life" is not necessary, to argue the fact that rights must be given to certain animals. They prefer lighter definitions of what gives an animal her inherent value.
We saw that the argument from interests and the argument from rights are not on the same. While the former focusses on experiences as parts of a whole system, which incidentally comprises individuals, the latter reminds us that holders of experiences, namely individual entities, matter more than the whole, as soon as they have an inherent value. Although those deep differences between utilitarians like Singer and proponents of an ethics based on rights like Regan, ecofeminists oppose both perspectives with one single criticism: "They believe that the 'sustained commitment to rational inquiry' endorsed by both Regan and Singer reflect the very worldview assumption that legitimizes the exploitation of animals in the first place" (p.95).
There are two points in ecofeminists arguments (Chapter five).
First, carnism (the implicit and pervasive hidden doctrine of meat-eaters) is an essential part of patriarchal power, and sums up all the forms of domination. Feminists should understand, according to Carol Adams, who is the champion of this kind of argument, that their fight for the liberation of women from male domination is closely related to the fight for the liberation of animals, and, hence, to vegetarianism. Vegetarianism is a radical embodied deconstruction of the patriarchal society.
Second, instead of leaning on rational inquiry, feminists should rely on ethics of care, for which the ascent is put on the relationship we can have with our fellow creatures.
Objections came from non-vegetarian feminists, and Singer and Regan both replied that they did not understand how they could be classified as conservative...
The next arguments for vegetarianism, described in chapters 6, 7, and 8 are not centered on animal welfare. They give reasons for being vegetarians, which focus on other aspects, like the environment, the wealth of mankind, and spirituality, whether religious (in the conventional meaning) or not.
In the Chapter 6, Walters shows that an environmentalist defense of vegetarianism never goes without qualification. The unity of concern is the ecosystem and its balance. As soon as eating meat does not imply severe damages to the environment, then there is nothing wrong with it. Walters provides us with graphic and appalling examples of environmental disasters (like the Ocean View Disaster, in June 1995) and a lot of interesting figures (p.119), which will certainly be of great interest for the vegetarian who wants to de-silence herself, in front of skeptical meat-eaters.
What is crucial for environmentalist theories is to make a substantial point about the intrinsic value of the environment. Walters reviews the different theories, from social ecology (Bookchin) to land ethics (Leopold) and deep ecology (Naess).
Sometimes, environmentalists dismiss vegetarianism, when it is not implied by a fight against factory-farming (which is obviously a moral ill for all environmentalists). The points made by Callicott, Rolston and Davis against bare ethical vegetarianism are developed and possible rejoinders are described.
In the chapter 7, Walters' interest centers on anthrocentric arguments, which run as follows:
Meat-eating is bad for health.
It is morally wrong not to take care of oneself.
Therefore, one should abstain from eating meat.
Anthrocentric vegetarians must give substantial reasons in order to make acceptable the claim that it is morally wrong not to take care of oneself. This leads us to a debate with libertarians, on utilitarian grounds.
In the Chapter 8, Walters shed light on the concept of "reverence for life", with both its religious and secularized uses (even is this secularization is not without theistic aspects). Schweitzer is at the origin of the idea that we should respect living beings for they are the holders of a value which a supreme being gave to them, by allowing them to exist. This argument took different forms, which Walters takes into account.
According to Walters, reverence is nevertheless a central concept, which is an essential part of any ethical vegetarianism (utilitarian, rights-centered, ecofeminist, environmentalist or anthrocentric): "Our food choices always gesture at a gestalt, a general way of thinking about the world and one's place in it. They reflect some of our most deeply held commitments and values. For the vegetarian, regardless of whether or not she's conventionaly religious, that gestalt is likely to be permeated by an abiding sense of awe at the world and respect for the creatures that dwell therein. This sense — this reverence — is the seasoning on every vegetarian meal." (p.176)
I have just one reservation, and that is about this point. Even if the point about reverence is nicely made, I find it too eclectic. Walters rightly insists that a vegetarian has come to vegetarianism and hinges on vegetarianism for a cluster of different reasons. And I agree. I agree, too, and that is the spirit in which this book is written, that, instead of trying to decide between environmental arguments and arguments from interests, for example, we should first try to understand compatibilities between the two. But, I don't think that this principle of tolerance gives, as a result, an argument for the supposition that some rather vague capacity (like reverence) is shared by any ethical vegetarian.
This reservation made, I warmly recommend this book.
© 2013 Christophe Al-Saleh
Christophe Al-Saleh, PhD, Philosopher and vegetarian, Amiens, France