email page print pageAll Topic Reviews
A New Understanding of Mental Disorders A Theory of Feelings Addictions Memory and the Self"Intimate" Violence against Women1001 Solution-Focused Questions101 Healing Stories101 Things I Wish I'd Known When I Started Using Hypnosis50 Great Myths of Popular Psychology50 Reasons People Give for Believing in a God8 Keys to Body Brain BalanceA Brief History of Modern PsychologyA Conceptual History of PsychologyA Conceptual History of Psychology: Exploring the Tangled Web A Cooperative SpeciesA Guide to Teaching Introductory PsychologyA History of Modern Experimental PsychologyA History of Psychology in AutobiographyA History of Social PsychologyA History of the BrainA History of the MindA Hole in the HeadA Matter of SecurityA Mind of Its OwnA Natural History of Human ThinkingA Place for ConsciousnessA Short Introduction to Promoting Resilience in ChildrenA Social History of PsychologyA Stroll With William JamesA System Architecture Approach to the BrainA Theory of FreedomA Very Bad WizardAbductedAbout FacesAccounts of InnocenceAction, Emotion and WillAdapting MindsAddiction and Self-ControlADHD & MeADHD in AdultsAdieu to GodAdolescence and Body ImageAdult Bipolar DisordersAdvances in Culture and PsychologyAdvances in Identity Theory and ResearchAffect Regulation, Mentalization, and the Development of SelfAffective MappingAgainst EmpathyAgainst HappinessAges and StagesAll Joy and No FunAll Out!All We Have to FearAlterations of ConsciousnessAmerican Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical NeurosciencesAn Argument for MindAncient Bodies, Modern LivesAnd BreatheAnimal MadnessAnimal Tool BehaviorAnimals in TranslationAnomalous CognitionAping MankindArtificial ConsciousnessAspects of PsychologismAsperger Syndrome and Your ChildAsperger Syndrome, Adolescence, and IdentityAssessment and Treatment of Childhood Problems, Second EditionAssisted Suicide and the Right to DieAttachedAttention is Cognitive UnisonAutism and the Myth of the Person AloneAutopsy of a Suicidal MindBecoming an Effective PsychotherapistBehavingBehavioral Genetics in the Postgenomic EraBeing No OneBelievingBetween Two WorldsBeyond AppearanceBeyond BlueBeyond BullyingBeyond MadnessBeyond MelancholyBeyond the BrainBeyond the DSM StoryBig DreamsBiofeedback for the BrainBipolar ChildrenBipolar DisorderBipolar KidsBlackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive DevelopmentBlind SpotsBlindsight & The Nature of ConsciousnessBlubberlandBlushBodiesBody ConsciousnessBody Image, Eating Disorders, and Obesity in YouthBody SenseBody WorkBorderline Personality DisorderBorderline Personality Disorder and the Conversational ModelBorn DigitalBorn to Be GoodBorn Together - Reared ApartBounceBoundaries in Human RelationshipsBounded RationalityBozo SapiensBrain and CultureBrain and the GazeBrain Arousal and Information TheoryBrain BugsBrain Change TherapyBrain Circuitry and Signaling in PsychiatryBrain FictionBrain, Mind, and Human Behavior in Contemporary Cognitive ScienceBrain-Based Therapy with AdultsBrain-WiseBrainstormBrainstormingBraintrustBrainwashingBrandedBreaking Murphy's LawBright-SidedBuddha's BrainBullying and TeasingBuyologyCan't You Hear Them?CaptureCare of the PsycheCartesian LinguisticsCartographies of the MindCerebrum 2007Cerebrum 2010Cerebrum 2015Cerebrum Anthology 2013Changing the SubjectCharacter Strengths and VirtuesCheating LessonsChild and Adolescent Psychological DisordersChildren’s Dreaming and the Development of Consciousness Chomsky NotebookClinical Psychiatry in Imperial GermanyClinical Psychology in Practice ClosureCognition and PerceptionCognition and the BrainCognitive BiologyCognitive DissonanceCognitive FictionsCognitive Mechanisms of Belief ChangeCognitive PragmaticsCognitive ScienceCognitive ScienceCognitive Systems and the Extended MindCognitive Therapy of Anxiety DisordersCognitive Unconscious and Human RationalityCold-Blooded KindnessComing of Age in Second LifeCommunication Issues In Autism And Asperger SyndromeCompassion and Healing in Medicine and SocietyComplementary and Alternative Therapies ResearchComprehending ColumbineConfessions of a SociopathConquering Shame and CodependencyConsciousnessConsciousnessConsciousnessConsciousnessConsciousnessConsciousness ConsciousnessConsciousness and Its Place in NatureConsciousness and LanguageConsciousness and Mental LifeConsciousness and MindConsciousness and the NovelConsciousness and the Social BrainConsciousness EmergingConsciousness RecoveredConsciousness RevisitedConsciousness, Self-Consciousness, and the Science of Being HumanConstructing PainConsumer NeuroscienceContemporary Debates in Cognitive ScienceConversations on ConsciousnessConviction of the InnocentCooperation and Its EvolutionCreating a Life of Meaning and CompassionCredit and BlameCritical New Perspectives on Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity DisorderCritical PsychologyCritical Thinking About PsychologyCross-Cultural PsychologyCrowdsourcingCrueltyCultural Assessment in Clinical PsychiatryCuriousDamasio's Error and Descartes' TruthDangerous and Severe Personality DisorderDaniel DennettDaughters of MadnessDeafness In MindDeath and ConsciousnessDeath of a ParentDecomposing the WillDeep Brain StimulationDeep ChinaDefining DifferenceDefining Psychopathology in the 21st CenturyDelusion and Self-DeceptionDelusions of GenderDennett and Ricoeur on the Narrative SelfDeparting from DevianceDescartes' BabyDescartes's Changing MindDescribing Inner Experience?Desert Islands and Other Texts (1953-1974)Destructive EmotionsDevelopment of Geocentric Spatial Language and CognitionDevelopment of PsychopathologyDialogues on DifferenceDid My Neurons Make Me Do It?Digital HemlockDirty MindsDisgust and Its DisordersDisorders of VolitionDo Apes Read Minds?Do Fish Feel Pain?Does Consciousness Cause Behavior?Doing without ConceptsDrunk Tank PinkEducating People to Be Emotionally IntelligentEffective IntentionsEffective Writing in PsychologyEffortless AttentionEmbodied Minds in ActionEmbracing MindEmbracing UncertaintyEmotion and ConsciousnessEmotion ExperienceEmotion RegulationEmotion, Evolution, And RationalityEmotional IntelligenceEmotionally InvolvedEmotionsEmotionsEmotions and LifeEmotions in Humans and ArtifactsEmotions RevealedEmotions, Aggression, and Morality in ChildrenEmotions, Stress, and HealthEmpathyEnjoymentErotic MoralityEscape Your Own PrisonEssays in Social NeuroscienceEssential Sources in the Scientific Study of ConsciousnessEthical Issues in Forensic Mental Health ResearchEthically Challenged ProfessionsEveryday Mind ReadingEvidence for PsiEvidence-Based Mental Health PracticeEvil MenEvolution and Human BehaviorEvolution and LearningEvolution, Games, and GodEvolution, Gender, and RapeEvolutionary Psychology and ViolenceEvolutionary Psychology as Maladapted PsychologyExacting BeautyExperiences of DepressionExperimenterExplaining the BrainExplaining the BrainExplorations in Neuroscience, Psychology and ReligionExploring TranssexualismExpression and the InnerExtending Self-Esteem ResearchExtraordinary BeliefsFact and Value in EmotionFaking ItFatigue as a Window to the BrainFavorite Activities for the Teaching of PsychologyFeeling GoodFeeling Pain and Being in PainFeelings and EmotionsFinding Meaning, Facing FearsFitting In Is OverratedFive Constraints on Predicting BehaviorFlourishingFlow: The Psychology of Optimal ExperienceFolk Psychological NarrativesFooling HoudiniForever YoungFormulation in Psychology and PsychotherapyFoucault, Psychology and the Analytics of PowerFoundational Issues in Human Brain MappingFoundations of Psychological ThoughtFree Will as an Open Scientific ProblemFreedom And NeurobiologyFreedom EvolvesFrom Axons to IdentityFrom Madness to Mental HealthFrom Neurons to Self-ConsciousnessFrom Passions to EmotionsFrom Philosophy to PsychotherapyFrom Symptom to SynapseFrontiers of ConsciousnessGay, Straight, and the Reason WhyGenerosityGenes, Environment, and PsychopathologyGenetic Nature/CultureGeniusGetting Under the SkinGlued to GamesGoing SaneGot Parts?Group GeniusGrowing Up GirlGuilt, Shame, and AnxietyGut ReactionsHallucinationHandbook New Sexuality StudiesHandbook of Closeness and IntimacyHandbook of Critical PsychologyHandbook of Emotion RegulationHandbook of EmotionsHandbook of Personality DisordersHandbook of PsychopathyHandbook of Self and IdentityHandbook of Self and IdentityHandbook of Spatial CognitionHappinessHappinessHappinessHappinessHappiness at WorkHappiness Is.Happy at LastHard to GetHardwired BehaviorHatredHealing the SplitHidden ResourcesHope and DespairHot ThoughtHot ThoughtHouse and PsychologyHow Animals Affect UsHow Animals GrieveHow Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe?How Doctors ThinkHow Enlightenment Changes Your BrainHow Families Still MatterHow History Made the MindHow Infants Know MindsHow Many Friends Does One Person Need?How People ChangeHow Professors ThinkHow The Body Shapes The MindHow the Body Shapes the Way We ThinkHow the Mind Explains BehaviorHow the Mind Uses the BrainHow to Change Someone You LoveHow We ReasonHow We RememberHughes' Outline of Modern PsychiatryHumanHuman BondingHuman Reasoning and Cognitive ScienceHypnotismHysteriaiBrainIdentifying Hyperactive ChildrenIdentifying the MindiDisorderImagination and the Meaningful BrainImitation and the Social MindImpulse Control DisordersImpulsivityIn an Unspoken VoiceIn Defense of SentimentalityIn DoubtIn Search of HappinessIn the Wake of 9/11Individual and Collective Memory ConsolidationInner Experience and NeuroscienceInner PresenceInside the American CoupleIntegrated Behavioral Health CareIntegrating Evolution and DevelopmentIntegrating Psychotherapy and PharmacotherapyIntegrity and the Fragile SelfIntellectual DisabilityIntelligenceIntelligence, Destiny, and EducationIntentions and IntentionalityInterdependent MindsInterpreting MindsInto the Minds of MadmenIntoxicating MindsIntrospection VindicatedIntuitionInventing PersonalityInvestigating the Psychological WorldIrrationalityIs There Anything Good About Men?Issues for Families, Schools and CommunitiesJane Sexes It UpJoint AttentionJoint AttentionJudgment and Decision MakingJust a DogJust BabiesJuvenile-Onset SchizophreniaKarl JaspersKey Thinkers in PsychologyKidding OurselvesKids of CharacterKilling MonstersLack of CharacterLanguage OriginsLanguage, Consciousness, CultureLanguage, Vision, and MusicLaw, Mind and BrainLess Than HumanLet Kids Be KidsLet's Talk About DeathLiving NarrativeLiving with Mild Cognitive ImpairmentLonelinessLooking for SpinozaLossLOT 2Love at Goon ParkMachine ConsciousnessMacrocognitionMade for Each OtherMadnessMadness and Modernism: Insanity in the light of modern art, literature, and thought Making a Good Brain GreatMaking Habits, Breaking HabitsMaking Minds and MadnessMaking Up the MindMale SexualityMan and WomanMan's Search for MeaningMan, Beast, and ZombieManic MindsManlinessMapping the MindMarking the MindMarvelous Learning AnimalMasculinity Studies and Feminist TheoryMeaningMeaning, Mortality, and ChoiceMedical MusesMeditating SelflesslyMeetings with a Remarkable ManMemoryMemory and DreamsMemory and EmotionMemory And UnderstandingMental BiologyMental IllnessMental Time TravelMetacognitionMetacognition and Theory of MindMethods in MindMindMindMind and BrainMind and ConsciousnessMind Games:Mind in LifeMind TimeMind to MindMind, Brain and the Elusive SoulMindful AngerMindfulnessMindfulnessMindfulness and AcceptanceMindfulness-Based Treatment Approaches: Clinician's Guide to Evidence Base and ApplicationsMinding AnimalsMinding MindsMindreadersMindreading AnimalsMinds, Brains, and LawMindsightMindworldsMirrors in the BrainMistakes Were Made (But Not by Me)Models of MadnessMoodMoral Development and RealityMoral MindsMoral Psychology, Volume 1Moral Psychology, Volume 2Moral Psychology, Volume 3Mothers and OthersMotivation and Cognitive ControlMotivational Interviewing: Preparing People For ChangeMovies and the MindMulticulturalism and the Therapeutic ProcessMultiplicityMuses, Madmen, and ProphetsMy Family AlbumMyths about SuicideNarrative IdentitiesNarrative PsychiatryNarratives in PsychiatryNaturalizing Intention in ActionNature and NarrativeNature Via NurtureNeither Bad nor MadNerveNeurobiology and the Development of Human MoralityNeurochemistry of ConsciousnessNeurodiversityNeuroethicsNeuroLogicNeurological Foundations of Cognitive Neuroscience Neuroscience and PhilosophyNo Child Left DifferentNo Two AlikeNot By Genes AloneNot Much Just Chillin'Not So Abnormal PsychologyNurturing the Older Brain and MindOn AnxietyOn Being an Introvert or Highly Sensitive PersonOn Being HumanOn Being MovedOn Deep History and the BrainOn DesireOn KillingOn Nature and LanguageOn PaedophiliaOn PersonalityOn the Frontier of AdulthoodOn the Origins of Cognitive ScienceOn The Stigma Of Mental IllnessOnflowOpen MindsOpening Skinner's BoxOrigin of MindOrigins of PsychopathologyOther MindsOut of Our HeadsOut of the WoodsOvercoming Depersonalization DisorderPanpsychism and the Religious AttitudePanpsychism in the WestParenting and the Child's WorldPassionate EnginesPathologies of the WestPatient-Based Approaches to Cognitive NeurosciencePediatric PsychopharmacologyPeople Types and Tiger StripesPerception & CognitionPerception beyond InferencePerception, Hallucination, and IllusionPersonal Development and Clinical PsychologyPerspectives on ImitationPhantoms in the BrainPhenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal KnowledgePhenomenology and Philosophy of MindPhilosophical Foundations of NeurosciencePhilosophical MidwiferyPhilosophy and HappinessPhilosophy of PsychologyPhilosophy, Neuroscience and ConsciousnessPhrenologyPhysical RealizationPhysics in MindPieces of LightPlaying with FirePositive PsychologyPositive PsychologyPostcards from the Brain MuseumPostpsychiatryPosttraumatic Stress DisorderPoverty and Brain Development During ChildhoodPractical Ethics for PsychologistsPractical Management of Personality DisorderPractical Management of Personality DisorderPredicative MindsPredictably IrrationalPreference, Belief, and SimilarityPrenatal Testosterone in MindPrivileged AccessProcess-Based CBTProcrastinationProust Was a NeuroscientistPsychiatric SlaveryPsychiatry as Cognitive NeurosciencePsychiatry, Psychoanalysis, And The New Biology Of MindPsychological AgencyPsychological Concepts and Biological PsychiatryPsychological Dimensions of the SelfPsychologists Defying the CrowdPsychologyPsychologyPsychology and Consumer CulturePsychology and LawPsychology and the Question of AgencyPsychology for ScreenwritersPsychology of Women: A Handbook of Issues and TheoriesPsychology's GhostsPsychology's Interpretive TurnPsychology's TerritoriesPsychopathologyPsychopathyPsychosis and EmotionPsychotherapy, American Culture, and Social PolicyPutnam CampPutting a Name to ItQuantum Memory PowerQuietRadical DistortionRadical Embodied Cognitive ScienceRadical ExternalismRadical GraceRapeRe-Visioning PsychiatryReal MaterialismReality CheckReconstructing Reason and RepresentationReconstructing the Cognitive WorldRecovery in Mental IllnessRecreative MindsRedirectReducing Adolescent RiskRegulating EmotionsRelational BeingRelational Mental HealthRelational Suicide AssessmentReliability in Cognitive NeuroscienceRemembering HomeRemembering Our ChildhoodResearch Advances in Genetics and GenomicsResearching Children's ExperienceResilience in ChildrenRestoring ResilienceRethinking ADHDRethinking Learning DisabilitiesRethinking Middle YearsRethinking the Western Understanding of the SelfRevolution in PsychologyRoadmap to ResilienceRomance and Sex in Adolescence and Emerging AdulthoodSchadenfreudeSchizophrenia RevealedSchizophrenia, Culture, and SubjectivityScience and Pseudoscience in Clinical PsychologyScience and Pseudoscience in Clinical PsychologySecond NatureSecond NatureSecond That EmotionSecond-order Change in PsychotherapySecrets of the MindSee What I'm SayingSee What I'm SayingSeeing and VisualizingSeeing RedSelf and SocietySelf Comes to MindSelf Control in Society, Mind, and BrainSelf-Awareness Deficits in Psychiatric PatientsSelf-CompassionSelf-RegulationSelf-Representational Approaches to ConsciousnessSelfless InsightSelvesSerial KillersSex at DawnSex on the BrainSex, Time and PowerSexual Coercion in Primates and HumansSexual DisordersSexual FluiditySexual ReckoningsSexualized BrainsShame and GuiltShatteredSimulating MindsSisyphus's BoulderSleepyheadSNAPSocial NeuroscienceSocial NeuroscienceSocial NeuroscienceSocial Psychology and DiscourseSome We Love, Some We Hate, Some We EatSoul DustSparkSpiral of EntrapmentSplendors and Miseries of the BrainSports Hypnosis in PracticeStanding at Water's EdgeStich and His CriticsStillpowerStop OverreactingStructure and Agency in Everyday LifeStructures of AgencyStuffStumbling on HappinessSubjectivity and SelfhoodSubstance Abuse and EmotionSuicidalSupersizing the MindSweet DreamsSynaptic SelfTales from Both Sides of the BrainTalking Oneself SoberTalking to BabiesTaming the Troublesome ChildTargeting AutismTeaching Problems and the Problems of TeachingTeleological RealismTen Years of Viewing from WithinTestosterone RexThat's DisgustingThe 5 Elements of Effective ThinkingThe Accidental MindThe Age of EmpathyThe Altruism EquationThe Altruistic BrainThe American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Clinical PsychiatryThe Anatomy of BiasThe Anxious BrainThe Archaeology of MindThe Art and Science of MindfulnessThe Art InstinctThe Art of HypnosisThe Asymmetrical BrainThe Bifurcation of the SelfThe Big Book of ConceptsThe Big DisconnectThe Birth of IntersubjectivityThe Birth of the MindThe Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge ManagementThe Blank SlateThe Body Has a Mind of Its OwnThe Bounds of CognitionThe Boy Who Was Raised as a DogThe BrainThe BrainThe Brain and the Meaning of LifeThe Brain SupremacyThe Brain That Changes ItselfThe Brain's Way of HealingThe Brain: Big Bangs, Behaviors, and BeliefsThe Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive ScienceThe Cambridge Handbook of Situated CognitionThe Character of ConsciousnessThe Chemistry Between UsThe Choice EffectThe Clinical Science of Suicide PreventionThe Cognitive Approach to Conscious MachinesThe Cognitive Behavioral Workbook for Anxiety: A Step-By-Step ProgramThe Cognitive NeurosciencesThe Cognitive-Emotional BrainThe College Fear FactorThe Commercialization of Intimate LifeThe Compass of PleasureThe Compassionate ConnectionThe Concepts of ConsciousnessThe Conscious BrainThe Conscious SelfThe Consuming InstinctThe Creating BrainThe Creative BrainThe Crucible of ConsciousnessThe Crucible of ExperienceThe Cure WithinThe Dao of NeuroscienceThe Developing MindThe Developing MindThe Development of PsychopathologyThe Disappearance of the Social in American Social PsychologyThe Dissolution of MindThe Duty to ProtectThe Educated ParentThe Ego TunnelThe Elephant in the RoomThe Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human ExperienceThe Emotional Foundations of PersonalityThe Emotional Journey of the Alzheimer's FamilyThe Encultured BrainThe Encyclopedia of StupidityThe Enduring Self in People with Alzheimer'sThe Epidemiology of SchizophreniaThe Essential DifferenceThe Ethical BrainThe Evolution of BeautyThe Evolution of ChildhoodThe Evolution of CooperationThe Evolution of LanguageThe Evolution of MindThe Evolving BrainThe Executive BrainThe Faces of TerrorismThe Feeling BrainThe Feeling of What HappensThe First IdeaThe Folly of FoolsThe Folly of FoolsThe Folly of FoolsThe Foundations of Cognitive ArchaeologyThe Fundamentalist MindsetThe GapThe Gender TrapThe Geography of BlissThe Gift of ShynessThe Good LifeThe Good LifeThe Happiness HypothesisThe Happiness of PursuitThe Health Psychology HandbookThe Healthy Aging BrainThe Heart of TraumaThe High Price of MaterialismThe History of PsychologyThe Human FaceThe Human SparkThe Hypomanic EdgeThe Imagery DebateThe Immeasurable MindThe Imprinted BrainThe Incredible Shrinking MindThe Innate MindThe Innate MindThe Integrated SelfThe Intentional BrainThe Language of ThoughtThe Languages of the BrainThe Lexicon of Adlerian PsychologyThe Lie DetectorsThe Lives of the BrainThe Lonely AmericanThe Lust for BloodThe Madness of WomenThe Male BrainThe Man Who Lost His LanguageThe Man Who Shocked the WorldThe Man Who Tasted ShapesThe Man Who Wasn't ThereThe Matter of the MindThe Mature MindThe Mean Girl MotiveThe Meaning of EvilThe Meaning of OthersThe Meaning of the BodyThe Measure of MadnessThe Measure of MindThe Medicalization of Everyday LifeThe Mind and the BrainThe Mind in ContextThe Mind of the ChildThe Mind of the HorseThe Mind's EyeThe Mind, the Body and the WorldThe Mind-Gut ConnectionThe Mindful BrainThe Misleading MindThe Moral MindThe Most Dangerous AnimalThe Most Human HumanThe Mother FactorThe Myth of ChoiceThe Myth of Depression as DiseaseThe Myth of Mirror NeuronsThe Myth of Self HelpThe Myth of Self-EsteemThe Myth of the Spoiled ChildThe Nature of the SelfThe Necessity Of MadnessThe Neuro RevolutionThe Neuron and the MindThe Neuropsychology of the UnconsciousThe Neuroscience of Human RelationshipsThe Neuroscience of PsychotherapyThe Neuroscience of Psychotherapy: Healing the Social BrainThe New BrainThe New Science of DreamingThe New Science of the MindThe New UnconsciousThe Normal PersonalityThe Origins of FairnessThe Overflowing BrainThe Oxford Companion to the MindThe Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of MindThe Paradoxical PrimateThe Perfectionist's HandbookThe Peripheral MindThe Phenomenology ReaderThe Philosopher's Secret FireThe Philosophical BabyThe Political MindThe Politics of HappinessThe Positive Side of Negative EmotionsThe Postnational SelfThe Postpartum EffectThe Power of PlayThe Praeger Handbook of TranssexualityThe Present Moment in Psychotherapy and Everyday LifeThe Primate MindThe Prism of GrammarThe Psychobiology of Trauma and Resilience Across the LifespanThe Psychological Construction of EmotionThe Psychology of Good and EvilThe Psychology of Good and EvilThe Psychology of HappinessThe Psychology of LifestyleThe Psychology of Religious FundamentalismThe Psychology of Science and the Origins of the Scientific MindThe Psychology of Science and the Origins of the Scientific MindThe Psychology of SpiritualityThe Psychology of StereotypingThe Psychology of SuperheroesThe Psychophysiology of Self-AwarenessThe Pursuit of PerfectThe Quest for Mental HealthThe Rational ImaginationThe Ravenous BrainThe Reasons of LoveThe Righteous MindThe Routledge Companion to Philosophy of PsychologyThe Routledge Companion to Philosophy of PsychologyThe Science of EvilThe Science of Intimate RelationshipsThe Science of Shame and its Treatment The Second SelfThe Secret History of EmotionThe Secret Lives of BoysThe Self and Its EmotionsThe Self-Sabotage CycleThe Sense of SelfThe Sensitive SelfThe Shape of ThoughtThe Social AnimalThe Social Nature of Mental IllnessThe Social Neuroscience of EmpathyThe Social Psychology of Good and EvilThe Social Psychology of MoralityThe Social Psychology of MoralityThe Story of Intellectual DisabilityThe Structure of ThinkingThe Survivors ClubThe Talking ApeThe Teenage BrainThe Tell-Tale BrainThe Temperamental ThreadThe Tender CutThe Tending InstinctThe Time ParadoxThe Trauma MythThe Trauma of Psychological TortureThe Trauma of Psychological TortureThe Trouble with IllnessThe True PathThe Truth About GriefThe Turing TestThe Uncertain SciencesThe Undoing ProjectThe Unhappy ChildThe Upside of IrrationalityThe War for Children's MindsThe Well-Tuned BrainThe Wild Girl, Natural Man, and the MonsterThe Winner's BrainThe Wisdom in FeelingThe Woman RacketThe World in My Mind, My Mind in the WorldThe Wow ClimaxThe Yipping TigerThemes, Issues and Debates in PsychologyTheoretical Issues in Psychology: An IntroductionTheory of AddictionTheory of MindThings and PlacesThink CatThink Confident, Be ConfidentThinking about AddictionThinking and SeeingThis Emotional Life: In Search of Ourselves...and HappinessThought and LanguageThought in a Hostile WorldTo Have and To Hurt:Toward an Evolutionary Biology of LanguageToward Replacement Parts for the BrainTrauma and Human ExistenceTrauma, Tragedy, TherapyTreating Attachment DisordersTreating Self-InjuryTreating Self-Injury: A Practical GuideTrue to Our FeelingsTrusting the Subject?Understanding and Treating Borderline Personality DisorderUnderstanding ConsciousnessUnderstanding ParanoiaUnderstanding PeopleUnderstanding TerrorismUndoing Perpetual StressUnlock the Genius WithinUnsettled MindsUnstrange MindsUnthinkingUnthoughtUs and ThemViolent PartnersVirtue, Vice, and PersonalityVision and MindVisual AgnosiaWarrior's DishonourWe Who Are DarkWednesday Is Indigo BlueWelcome to Your BrainWhat Do Women Want?What Dying People WantWhat Have We DoneWhat Intelligence Tests MissWhat Is an Emotion: Classic and Contemporary ReadingsWhat Is Emotion?What is Intelligence?What Is Mental Illness?What Is Thought?What Makes Your Brain Happy and Why You Should Do the Opposite What the Best College Students DoWhat the Dog SawWhat We Know about Emotional IntelligenceWhat We Say MattersWhat's Wrong With Morality?When Boys Become BoysWhen Perfect Isn't Good EnoughWhen the Impossible HappensWhen Walls Become DoorwaysWho's Been Sleeping in Your HeadWho's in Charge?Why Humans Like to CryWhy Love MattersWhy Lyrics LastWhy People CooperateWhy People Die by SuicideWhy Sex Matters: A Darwinian Look at Human BehaviorWhy Smart People Can Be So StupidWhy the Mind is Not a ComputerWhy Us?Why We LieWhy We LoveWhy We SleepWider than the SkyWilliam James at the BoundariesWilling, Wanting, WaitingWittgenstein And PsychologyWomen and Child Sexual AbuseWorking MindsYoga and PsychologyYou Are What You RememberYoung Minds in Social WorldsYour Brain on CubsYour Brain on FoodYour Brain on Food: How Chemicals Control Your Thoughts and Feelings,Your Brain on YogaYour Child in the BalanceZombies and Consciousness
It is difficult to know quite what to think about Roy Baumeister's Is There Anything Good About Men?: How Cultures Flourish By Exploiting Men. That will hopefully excuse some of the length of this review, but the nature of the book really calls for a critical response as well, and that necessitates an extended discussion. Please bear with me: in what follows, I will be trying to recount the argument of the book such as it is, and then I will offer a few of what seem to me the most significant criticisms of that argument.
The sorry case of Larry Summers seems to be an important touchstone for Baumeister. Summers was the Harvard University president censured for having publicly speculated on whether it was prejudice or ability that best accounted for the scarcity of women among top scientists. This minor bit of thought crime (though perhaps not minor for Summers) sets the stage for Baumeister's thesis. The opposition implied in Summers' comments refers to the theoretical dilemma between explaining the persistent underrepresentation of women among the upper ranks of scientists, artists, musicians, and athletes, as well as in many other fields, by genuine differences in ability on one hand or by oppression and prejudice on the other. The bad old view that men's overrepresentation in such positions is due to inherently greater male ability has been largely outstripped in popularity by the view that such inequalities in society are the result of a history of patriarchal culture constraining women's choices and relegating them to lower-level work that does not reflect women's abilities, as well as oppresses their ambitions and dreams.
Baumeister agrees with neither view: according to Baumeister's assessment of the research, differences in ability between men and women are insignificant. The notion of patriarchy Baumeister likens to a conspiracy theory in which men plot against women to keep the best positions in society for themselves. Instead, Baumeister proposes his own "radical" theory of gender differences, which he sums up in the expression "different but equal." (38) According to this theory, neither gender is superior in ability to the other, and culture exploits both, albeit in different ways. Differences, such as in what field a gender dominates, persist due to trade-offs, as when success in one pursuit precludes success in some other pursuit. What follows is an evolutionary psychological theory to explain why gender inequalities are the way they are.
To put it starkly, Baumeister's thesis is that the real important differences between men and women lie in the strength and direction of their motivation. Men and women can both achieve in, say, mathematics, but men are more highly driven to achieve in general, as well as in such a discipline. In the notion of "trade-offs," Baumeister seems to be proposing a kind of naturally-occurring division of labor that follows from the difference in motivation. He offers the traits of aggression and nurturing as an example (39): it might be that a given culture has purposes that call for each of these traits (competition with other cultures; raising healthy children), but perhaps it is unlikely that one individual could excel in both, while a generalist would be at a disadvantage in both. So, it comes down to a trade-off between the trait of aggression and that of nurturing, and by and large males have been selected for aggression. Baumeister claims these differences are almost certainly due to biological causes though he also has something to say about the role of culture as well (more on this later). He gives two theoretical rationales for gender-based differences in motivation.
First, Baumeister refers us to what he dubs "The Most Underappreciated Fact about Men." In short, in the great race to pass on our genes, women are a shoo-in, but for men, there are no guarantees. Women, as long as they make it to reproductive maturity, have much better odds of reproducing themselves, since they need only wait around for some eligible male to offer to inseminate them. Men, on the other hand, are obliged to prove their worthiness to reproduce and typically do so by some risky means, like hunting mastodon or writing the great American novel. All men are obliged to prove themselves, but many simply fail, which in the case of mastodon hunting might mean starvation or violent death, or in the case of novel writing, poverty, bitterness and alcoholism, none of which are conducive to reproductive success.
The result is that everyone alive today is descended from twice as many women as men. This is supported by DNA analysis and Baumeister lists several sources of original research for this conclusion. But he also offers this more homey reflection (61-2): among wild horses, and many other species, the family pattern consists of a dominant male, a group of females and a group of younger males. The dominant male controls sexual access to the females, and unless they are successful in the struggle for dominance themselves, the younger males will not get the chance to reproduce. While each foal has one father and one mother, the population as a whole has one father and as many mothers as the mares who foaled. And this of course will be reflected in the DNA of subsequent horse populations.
So each young male is obliged to engage in risky business for the chance to reproduce, while the females need only await the results of the dominance contest. The upshot is that given these different strategies for reproductive success, we are descended from women who played it safe and from men who took risks. This is part of Baumeister's explanation of differences in distribution of social goods: men have more because they are driven by the need to take risks in order to reproduce, whereas women have had little motivation to accomplish, or even try, the great things, because they didn't have to in order to reproduce. The result is that men achieve the more spectacular feats, if they succeed at all. Hence, men are the inventors, creative artists, sports heroes, explorers, and such, not because of a conspiracy to exclude women, but because men are driven to it, while women are not.
Second, Baumeister appeals to gender differences in the expression of the human need to belong. He points out that while it has been argued that women are more social than men, his own research indicates that there are few differences between men and women in the need to connect. What is different is the type of social organization in which they specialize. Women specialize in a close, intimate relationship, he claims, while men specialize in larger networks of shallower relationships. Again, this results in differences in motivation, since men's larger networks encourage the self-differentiation and competition necessary to stand out. Competitiveness in intimate relationships may be destructive of those relationships, and so, is incompatible with them. Further, one can see differences in personality traits following from this, such as men's (supposed) emotional distance and aggressiveness.
But the real kicker in this line of thought lies in the nature of the activities that are best suited to each form of social specialization. The wider, shallower relationships of men fit well with participation in team sports, political organizations, larger-scale business and trade, and such. This provides the explanation as to why we see so few women in politics and the upper ranks of corporations--they just don't like that sort of thing. It doesn't fit well with the relationships they prefer.
This also offers an alternative theory about the nature of culture. Baumeister seems to regard as a central thesis of feminism that men invented patriarchal culture as a tool to oppress women and keep the most culturally significant positions in society for themselves. Baumeister's explanation is that men occupy such positions because the relationships in which they specialize allow them to best take advantage of culture. Baumeister defines culture as a kind of system that enables human groups to use information to work together effectively. This works most effectively with the relatively larger groups to which men tend to belong, since there are gains unavailable in smaller groups from being able to create an extensive division of labor. Hence, culture is male because of the fit with men's relationship style, and men have ended up with most of the goods of society because they are able to produce them more effectively.
As the subtitle announces, Baumeister is also arguing that culture actually exploits men to its benefit. However, he does not mean to invoke the parallel one might assume with the situation of women described in feminism. Baumeister does not seem to use the term "exploitation" to connote a socio-economic crime and he is not arguing for male victimhood either. Rather, his point is that the social organization we have inherited is the product of male labour and the particular roles men have played in culture. For example, he claims that the major institutions of society are the result of male specialization in larger, impersonal groups. Whatever benefits that result from these institutions are due not to a male conspiracy to exclude women, but rather are simply a product of characteristic differences in male and female patterns of activity. Women didn't need to be kept out of these institutions because they generally would not have left their intimate personal relationships anyway. To Baumeister's mind, the fact that women start more small businesses than men, but seem content to remain small, testifies to the absence of barriers to women's involvement in business. So much for the "glass ceiling."
Further, men's cultural role makes them responsible for surplus production, on which all growth depends. This is the meaning of the need to 'earn manhood'. Male relationships are characterized by a shortage of respect: from early on in a man's life, it is made clear that, unlike women, he will not be accepted simply as he is, but will have to earn the respect of other men and women by supporting himself at minimum, but preferably by creating wealth to provide for others.
Beside the gains to society from organizing major institutions and providing excess production, men are exploited by being disposable. Social organization entails the existence of risky, dirty jobs that someone has to do in order for the society to survive and flourish, and a disproportionate share of these fall on men's shoulders. When someone has to go to war and kill and be killed, or go down in the mine and get the black lung, or venture into the unknown to expand territory, economic capacity or scientific knowledge, it is almost always men who go. Culture benefits from treating men as expendable, since it achieves things it otherwise wouldn't be able to. By contrast, women are treated as more valuable due to the differences in reproductive chances between men and women: a single male can have far more children than a single woman can, and hence, fewer men are necessary to ensure the next generation.
This is Baumeister's argument in brief. Throughout, Baumeister does a lot of hand-waving to ward off misinterpretation of his ideas, but misinterpretation or not, there seems to be a number of glaring holes in his theory.
The first I'll mention concerns how Baumeister positions his theory in opposition to the feminist theory of patriarchy. In the course of explaining the relationship of his ideas on gender to feminism, Baumeister recites a familiar potted history of the feminist movement over approximately the last half century. According to this story, in the good old days, idealistic, noble-minded women promoted equality and positive views of both genders, in a spirit of freethinking openness. But then, feminism was "stolen" by antagonistic, anti-male female Stalinists, who immediately instituted a radical feminist doctrinal rigidity and condemned all dissent, and men as well, to the gulag. Not to say there might not be a kernel of truth in this picture, but it is evidently so simplistic as to depict a movement that never was.
This bothers Baumeister very little though, since as he remarks, he is "not debating any actual feminist scholars or the movement of feminist thought itself." (9) Indeed, his foil is actually what he refers to as the "Imaginary Feminist." When Baumeister argues for his theories on gender, he says, he is arguing with "a certain stereotyped feminist outlook." (10) He addresses this character, the "Imaginary Feminist," "to remind us of the established wisdom" and to address "misconceptions that many men have about gender relations." (10) In short, he is arguing with "feminists as they are perceived by men." (10; italics original)
It is not clear to me that all of these characterizations amount to the same thing. For example, is the "certain stereotyped feminist outlook" stereotyped because it is typical of the behavior of actual feminists? Baumeister claims not to be addressing the views of any actual feminists. But then does the responsibility for stereotyping feminist views lie with others who don't know what actual feminists think? This seems more likely the case. But how would that count as "the established wisdom," since Baumeister also describes it as a "misconception"? If he is talking about stereotypes of feminism, wouldn't attempting to sort out the truth of matters be the sensible thing to do? He repeatedly eschews this responsibility as irrelevant to his project. If he is addressing misconceptions about feminism, then why embody these misconceptions and make them the foil of his arguments, unless he intends to correct them? It seems that Baumeister wants things both ways: to attribute to feminists these stereotypical views and then rebut them, while waving away as irrelevant the responsibility of ensuring that he is addressing real feminist views of gender. What point could be made by making such a Don Quixote-like tilt at an imaginary dragon?
Second, even setting aside the Imaginary Feminist, Baumeister is arguing against a strawman, in at least three ways. Labeling the notion of patriarchy as a "conspiracy theory" completely trivializes feminist views. "Conspiracy" implies a covert scheme to manipulate events, but the majority of the practices identified by feminists as oppressive or constraining of women's choices have been conducted openly. It is only recently that it has been necessary to conceal discriminatory practices. But ultimately, whether oppression is open or covert misses the point: the notion of patriarchy describes a wide variety of practices of varying degrees of visibility that have a deleterious effect primarily on women. The point is the impact of these practices on women. Further, in coming up with his "radical" theory that the cause of gender inequalities is motivation and not oppression, Baumeister ignores the fact that feminists have theorized about motivational questions as well. It is clear that there are differing directions of motivation between men and women. This assertion is so trivial, one wonders how anything Baumeister says about it could be imagined to be "radical". But feminists have gone on to examine the possible causes, most of which Baumeister simply ignores, such as the effects of varying degrees of rigidity in gender roles, the penalties for transgressing their boundaries, and even the simple absence of female role models in a particular field. These are all plausible effects on motivation, and are not based on any far-fetched conspiracy theory. Finally, Baumeister gives no indication of being aware of the accumulated evidence of actual, concrete constraints placed on women's behavior, from legal restrictions to social disapprobation. Or, if he is aware, he offers no counterargument for dismissing this evidence. As a society, we are only just emerging from a regime of explicit legal restrictions on women, such as lack of suffrage, inability to hold property and a number of others. If, ex hypothesi, women just didn't want to do these things, why would it be necessary to write these prohibitions into law? Consider Baumeister's explanation of differences in motivation by gender differences in forms of social relationship: the features of our culture that he claims flow naturally from the male pattern of relationships (large-scale, impersonal, competitive) are also those that have had the most obvious and striking prohibitions against women's involvement: religion, the military, politics and higher education. So was it really simply that women preferred more intimate relationships? But there are also a myriad of informal constraints that regulate behaviour, concerning acceptable forms of employment, recreation and such. All of this has been uncovered through research into the nature of gender in our society and, if his argument is to have any credibility, Baumeister needs to address this.
It seems possible to continue nitpicking at Baumeister's claims and examples indefinitely, but things really couldn't get much worse for his argument than already detailed, so I will finish with one more general criticism. Baumeister's argument comes close to assuming its conclusion in the following respect: before motivation can serve as an explanation for gender inequalities in society, one has to assume that we live in (and have through most of human history) a sort of quasi-meritocracy. Do we have a good reason to think that the highest levels of achievement in our society reliably track the highest levels of motivation to achieve (holding ability constant, as would seem to be Baumeister's thesis)? On the contrary, we have every reason to believe that a diversity of prohibitions and restrictions have blocked or limited the achievements of identifiable groups within our society throughout human history. Even if not sex (as Baumeister seems to claim), then what about race, class, ethnicity, etc.? Even the way one speaks has been a limiting factor on one's access to certain levels of society, speech being an important determinant of acceptability for group membership, at least in some times and places. But if we cannot assume that the heights of achievement are determined primarily by how badly one wants to achieve something, then motivation will be an inadequate explanation of the different levels of achievement between groups. But Baumeister's sole argument against there being barriers to women's achievement is simply to "prove" that there are naturally occurring differences in motivation between men and women, which effectively assumes what is to be proven.
So, what to say about Is There Anything Good About Men? Baumeister's argument fails to be anything he claims it is. It is not a "radical" theory in any sense: rather, it is a glib, superficial recitation of half-truths that are now long familiar in any case. Motivation and differences in preferences between men and women have been cited frequently to explain gender inequalities, and have been refuted time and again in feminist theory. Arguments that attack a strawman of feminist theory are rife on the internet. The only striking thing here is that Baumeister acknowledges that his target is effectively a strawman, though not in so many words, and dismisses the relevance of this concern. Much of what Baumeister has to say may have some truth to it, but whatever truth there is, is quickly lost to the pointlessness of criticizing theories that feminists do not hold. In conclusion, there are plenty of things about men that are good--but this book is just not one of them.
© 2011 George Williamson
George Williamson, University of Saskatchewan