email page print pageAll Topic Reviews
Anger and Forgiveness"Are You There Alone?"10 Good Questions about Life and DeathA Casebook of Ethical Challenges in NeuropsychologyA Companion to BioethicsA Companion to BioethicsA Companion to GenethicsA Companion to GenethicsA Companion to Muslim EthicsA Cooperative SpeciesA Critique of the Moral Defense of VegetarianismA Delicate BalanceA Fragile LifeA Life for a LifeA Life-Centered Approach to BioethicsA Matter of SecurityA Natural History of Human MoralityA Philosophical DiseaseA Practical Guide to Clinical Ethics ConsultingA Question of TrustA Sentimentalist Theory of the MindA Short Stay in SwitzerlandA Tapestry of ValuesA Very Bad WizardA World Without ValuesAction and ResponsibilityAction Theory, Rationality and CompulsionActs of ConscienceAddiction and ResponsibilityAddiction NeuroethicsAdvance Directives in Mental HealthAfter HarmAftermathAgainst AutonomyAgainst BioethicsAgainst HealthAgainst MarriageAgainst Moral ResponsibilityAgency and AnswerabilityAgency and ResponsibilityAgency, Freedom, and Moral ResponsibilityAging, Biotechnology, and the FutureAlbert Schweitzer's Reverence for LifeAlphavilleAltruismAltruismAmerican EugenicsAmerican PsychosisAn American SicknessAn Anthology of Psychiatric EthicsAn Introduction to EthicsAn Introduction to Evolutionary EthicsAn Introduction to Kant's Moral Philosophy And a Time to DieAnimal LessonsAnimal RightsAnimals Like UsApplied Ethics in Mental Health CareAre Women Human?Arguments about AbortionAristotle on Practical WisdomAristotle's Ethics and Moral ResponsibilityAssisted Suicide and the Right to DieAutonomyAutonomy and the Challenges to LiberalismAutonomy, Consent and the LawBabies by DesignBackslidingBad PharmaBad SoulsBarriers and BelongingBasic Desert, Reactive Attitudes and Free WillBeauty JunkiesBefore ForgivingBeing AmoralBeing YourselfBending Over BackwardsBending ScienceBernard WilliamsBetter Humans?Better Than WellBeyond ChoiceBeyond GeneticsBeyond HatredBeyond Humanity?Beyond LossBeyond LossBeyond Moral JudgmentBeyond SpeechBeyond the DSM StoryBias in Psychiatric DiagnosisBioethicsBioethicsBioethics and the BrainBioethics at the MoviesBioethics Beyond the HeadlinesBioethics Critically ReconsideredBioethics in a Liberal SocietyBioethics in the ClinicBiomedical EthicsBiomedical EthicsBiomedical EthicsBiomedical EthicsBiomedical Research and BeyondBiosBioscience EthicsBipolar ChildrenBluebirdBodies out of BoundsBodies, Commodities, and BiotechnologiesBody BazaarBoundBoundaries and Boundary Violations in PsychoanalysisBraintrustBrandedBreaking the SilenceBuffy the Vampire Slayer and PhilosophyCapital PunishmentCase Studies in Biomedical Research EthicsChallenging the Stigma of Mental IllnessCharacter and Moral Psychology Character as Moral FictionChild Well-BeingChildrenChildren's RightsChoosing ChildrenChoosing Not to ChooseClinical Dilemmas in PsychotherapyClinical EthicsCloningClose toYouCoercion as CureCoercive Treatment in PsychiatryCognition of Value in Aristotle's EthicsCognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy Comfortably NumbCommonsense RebellionCommunicative Action and Rational ChoiceCompetence, Condemnation, and CommitmentComprehending CareConducting Insanity EvaluationsConfidential RelationshipsConfidentiality and Mental HealthConflict of Interest in the ProfessionsConsuming KidsContemporary Debates In Applied EthicsContemporary Debates in Moral TheoryContemporary Debates in Social PhilosophyContentious IssuesContesting PsychiatryCrazy in AmericaCreating CapabilitiesCreatures Like Us?Crime and CulpabilityCrime, Punishment, and Mental IllnessCritical Perspectives in Public HealthCritical PsychiatryCrueltyCultural Assessment in Clinical PsychiatryCurrent Controversies in BioethicsCurrent Controversies in Values and ScienceCutting to the CoreCyborg CitizenDamaged IdentitiesDeaf Identities in the MakingDeath Is That Man Taking NamesDebating ProcreationDebating Same-Sex MarriageDecision Making, Personhood and DementiaDecoding the Ethics CodeDefining DifferenceDefining Right and Wrong in Brain ScienceDefining the Beginning and End of LifeDelusions of GenderDementiaDemocracy in What State?Demons of the Modern WorldDescriptions and PrescriptionsDesert and VirtueDesire, Practical Reason, and the GoodDestructive Trends in Mental HealthDeveloping the VirtuesDid My Neurons Make Me Do It?Difference and IdentityDigital HemlockDigital SoulDignityDisability BioethicsDisability, Difference, DiscriminationDiscrimination against the Mentally IllDisordered Personalities and CrimeDisorders of VolitionDisorientation and Moral LifeDivided Minds and Successive SelvesDoes Feminism Discriminate against Men?Does Torture Work?Double Standards in Medical Research in Developing CountriesDown GirlDrugs and JusticeDworkin and His CriticsDying in the Twenty-First CenturyEarly WarningEconomics and Youth ViolenceEmbodied RhetoricsEmerging Conceptual, Ethical and Policy Issues in BionanotechnologyEmotional ReasonEmotions in the Moral LifeEmotions in the Moral LifeEmpathyEmpathy and Moral DevelopmentEmpathy and MoralityEmpirical Ethics in PsychiatryEncountering NatureEncountering the Sacred in PsychotherapyEngendering International HealthEnhancing EvolutionEnhancing Human CapacitiesEnoughEros and the GoodErotic InnocenceErotic MoralityEssays on Derek Parfit's On What MattersEssays on Free Will and Moral ResponsibilityEthical Choices in Contemporary MedicineEthical Conflicts in PsychologyEthical Dilemmas in PediatricsEthical Issues in Behavioral ResearchEthical Issues in Dementia CareEthical Issues in Forensic Mental Health ResearchEthical Issues in the New GeneticsEthical LifeEthical Reasoning for Mental Health ProfessionalsEthical TheoryEthical WillsEthically Challenged ProfessionsEthicsEthicsEthicsEthics and AnimalsEthics and ScienceEthics and the A PrioriEthics and the Discovery of the UnconsciousEthics and the Metaphysics of MedicineEthics at the CinemaEthics at the End of LifeEthics Case Book of the American Psychoanalytic AssociationEthics Done RightEthics ExpertiseEthics for EveryoneEthics for PsychologistsEthics for the New MillenniumEthics in CyberspaceEthics in Health CareEthics In Health Services ManagementEthics in Mental Health ResearchEthics in PracticeEthics in PsychiatryEthics in PsychologyEthics in Psychotherapy and CounselingEthics of PsychiatryEthics without OntologyEthics, Culture, and PsychiatryEthics, Sexual Orientation, and Choices about ChildrenEvaluating the Science and Ethics of Research on HumansEvilEvil GenesEvil in Modern ThoughtEvil in Modern ThoughtEvolution, Gender, and RapeEvolutionary Ethics and Contemporary BiologyEvolutionary Psychology and ViolenceEvolved MoralityExperiments in EthicsExploding the Gene MythExploiting ChildhoodFacing Human SufferingFact and ValueFacts and ValuesFaking ItFalse-Memory Creation in Children and AdultsFat ShameFatal FreedomFellow-Feeling and the Moral LifeFeminism and Its DiscontentsFeminist Ethics and Social and Political PhilosophyFeminist TheoryFinal ExamFirst Do No HarmFirst, Do No HarmFlashpointFlesh WoundsForced to CareForgivenessForgivenessForgiveness and LoveForgiveness and ReconciliationForgiveness and RetributionFoucault and the Government of DisabilityFoundational Issues in Human Brain MappingFoundations of Forensic Mental Health AssessmentFree WillFree Will And Moral ResponsibilityFree Will and Reactive AttitudesFree Will, Agency, and Meaning in LifeFree?Freedom and ValueFreedom vs. InterventionFriendshipFrom Darwin to HitlerFrom Disgust to HumanityFrom Enlightenment to ReceptivityFrom Morality to Mental HealthFrom Silence to VoiceFrom Valuing to ValueFrontiers of JusticeGender in the MirrorGenetic PoliticsGenetic ProspectsGenetic ProspectsGenetics of Original SinGenetics of Original SinGenocide's AftermathGetting RealGluttonyGood WorkGoodness & AdviceGreedGroups in ConflictGrowing Up GirlGut FeminismHabilitation, Health, and AgencyHandbook for Health Care Ethics CommitteesHandbook of BioethicsHandbook of Children's RightsHandbook of PsychopathyHappinessHappiness and the Good LifeHappiness Is OverratedHard FeelingsHard LuckHardwired BehaviorHarmful ThoughtsHeal & ForgiveHealing PsychiatryHealth Care Ethics for PsychologistsHeterosyncraciesHistorical and Philosophical Perspectives on Biomedical EthicsHoly WarHookedHookedHow Can I Be Trusted?How Propaganda WorksHow to Do Things with Pornography How to Make Opportunity EqualHow Universities Can Help Create a Wiser WorldHow We HopeHow We Think About DementiaHuman BondingHuman EnhancementHuman GoodnessHuman Identity and BioethicsHuman TrialsHumanism, What's That?Humanitarian ReasonHumanityHumanizing MadnessI am Not Sick I Don't Need Help!I Was WrongIdentifying Hyperactive ChildrenIf That Ever Happens to MeImproving Nature?In Defense of FloggingIn Defense of SinIn Love With LifeIn Our Own ImageIn the FamilyIn the Land of the DeafIn the Name of IdentityIn the Wake of 9/11In Two MindsInclusive EthicsInformed Consent in Medical ResearchInnovation in Medical TechnologyInside Assisted LivingInside EthicsIntelligence, Race, and GeneticsIntensive CareInto the Gray ZoneIs Human Nature Obsolete?Is Long-Term Therapy Unethical?Is There a Duty to Die?Is There an Ethicist in the House?Issues in Philosophical CounselingJudging Children As ChildrenJust a DogJust BabiesJust CareJustice for ChildrenJustice for HedgehogsJustice in RobesJustice, Luck, and KnowledgeJustifiable ConductKant on Moral AutonomyKant's Theory of VirtueKids of CharacterKilling McVeighLack of CharacterLack of CharacterLaw and the BrainLearning About School ViolenceLearning from Baby PLeaving YouLectures on the History of Political PhilosophyLegal and Ethical Aspects of HealthcareLegal Aspects of Mental CapacityLegal ConceptionsLegal InsanityLegalizing ProstitutionLet Them Eat ProzacLevelling the Playing FieldLiberal Education in a Knowledge SocietyLiberal EugenicsLife After FaithLife at the BottomLife, Sex, and IdeasListening to the WhispersLiving ProfessionalismLosing Matt ShepardLostLuckyMad in AmericaMad PrideMadhouseMaking Another World PossibleMaking Babies, Making FamiliesMaking Genes, Making WavesMaking Sense of Freedom and ResponsibilityMalignantMasculinity Studies and Feminist TheoryMeaning and Moral OrderMeaning in LifeMeaning in Life and Why It MattersMeans, Ends, and PersonsMeans, Ends, and PersonsMedical Enhancement and PosthumanityMedical Research for HireMedicalized MasculinitiesMedically Assisted DeathMeditations for the HumanistMelancholia and MoralismMental Health Professionals, Minorities and the PoorMental Illness, Medicine and LawMerit, Meaning, and Human BondageMetaethical SubjectivismMill's UtilitarianismMind FieldsMind WarsMind WarsModern Theories of JusticeModernity and TechnologyMoney ShotMonsterMoral Acquaintances and Moral DecisionsMoral BrainsMoral ClarityMoral CultivationMoral Development and RealityMoral Dilemmas in Real LifeMoral DimensionsMoral EntanglementsMoral FailureMoral LiteracyMoral MachinesMoral MindsMoral OriginsMoral Panics, Sex PanicsMoral ParticularismMoral PerceptionMoral PsychologyMoral Psychology: Volume IVMoral RealismMoral RelativismMoral RepairMoral Responsibility and Alternative PossibilitiesMoral Status and Human LifeMoral StealthMoral Theory at the MoviesMoral TribesMoral Value and Human DiversityMoral, Immoral, AmoralMoralismMorality and Self-InterestMorality in a Natural WorldMorality, Moral Luck and ResponsibilityMorals, Rights and Practice in the Human ServicesMorals, Rights and Practice in the Human ServicesMore Than HumanMotive and RightnessMovies and the Moral Adventure of LifeMurder in the InnMy Body PoliticMy Brain Made Me Do ItMy Sister's KeeperMy Sister's KeeperMy WayNano-Bio-EthicsNarrative MedicineNarrative ProsthesisNatural Ethical FactsNatural-Born CybogsNaturalized BioethicsNeither Bad nor MadNeoconservatismNeonatal BioethicsNeurobiology and the Development of Human MoralityNeuroethicsNeuroethicsNeuroethicsNew Takes in Film-PhilosophyNew Waves in EthicsNew Waves in MetaethicsNietzsche on Ethics and PoliticsNo Child Left DifferentNo Impact ManNormative EthicsNormativityNothing about us, without us!Oath BetrayedOf War and LawOn ApologyOn Being AuthenticOn EvilOn Human RightsOn The Stigma Of Mental IllnessOn the TakeOn Virtue EthicsOn What MattersOn What We Owe to Each OtherOne ChildOne Nation Under TherapyOne World NowOne World NowOur Bodies, Whose Property?Our Bodies, Whose Property?Our Daily MedsOur Faithfulness to the PastOur Posthuman FutureOut of EdenOut of Its MindOut of the ShadowsOverdosed AmericaOxford Handbook of Psychiatric EthicsOxford Studies in Normative EthicsOxford Textbook of Philosophy of PsychiatryPassionate DeliberationPatient Autonomy and the Ethics of ResponsibilityPC, M.D.Perfecting VirtuePersonal AutonomyPersonal Autonomy in SocietyPersonal Identity and EthicsPersonalities on the PlatePersonhood and Health CarePersons, Humanity, and the Definition of DeathPerspectives On Health And Human RightsPharmaceutical FreedomPharmacracyPharmageddonPhilosophy and This Actual WorldPhilosophy of BiologyPhilosophy of Technology: The Technological ConditionPhysician-Assisted DyingPicturing DisabilityPilgrim at Tinker CreekPlaying God?Playing God?Political EmotionsPornlandPowerful MedicinesPractical Autonomy and BioethicsPractical EthicsPractical Ethics for PsychologistsPractical RulesPragmatic BioethicsPragmatic BioethicsPragmatic NeuroethicsPraise and BlamePreferences and Well-BeingPrimates and PhilosophersPro-Life, Pro-ChoiceProcreation and ParenthoodProfits Before People?Progress in BioethicsProperty in the BodyProzac As a Way of LifeProzac on the CouchPsychiatric Aspects of Justification, Excuse and Mitigation in Anglo-American Criminal Law Psychiatric EthicsPsychiatry and EmpirePsychological Concepts and Biological PsychiatryPsychology and Consumer CulturePsychology and LawPsychotropic Drug Prescriber's Survival GuidePublic Health LawPublic Health Law and EthicsPublic PhilosophyPunishing the Mentally IllPunishmentPursuits of WisdomPutting Morality Back Into PoliticsPutting on VirtueQuality of Life and Human DifferenceRaceRadical HopeRadical VirtuesRape Is RapeRe-creating MedicineRe-Engineering Philosophy for Limited BeingsReason's GriefReasonably ViciousReckoning With HomelessnessReconceiving Medical EthicsRecovery from SchizophreniaRedefining RapeRedesigning HumansReducing the Stigma of Mental IllnessReflections On How We LiveReframing Disease ContextuallyRefusing CareRefuting Peter Singer's Ethical TheoryRelative JusticeRelativism and Human RightsReligion ExplainedReprogeneticsRescuing JeffreyResponsibilityResponsibility and PsychopathyResponsibility and PunishmentResponsibility and PunishmentResponsibility from the MarginsResponsible GeneticsRethinking CommodificationRethinking Informed Consent in BioethicsRethinking Mental Health and DisorderRethinking RapeReturn to ReasonRevolution in PsychologyRightsRights, Democracy, and Fulfillment in the Era of Identity PoliticsRisk and Luck in Medical EthicsRobert NozickRousseau and the Dilemmas of Modernity Rule of Law, Misrule of MenRun, Spot, RunRunning on RitalinSatisficing and MaximizingSchizophrenia, Culture, and SubjectivityScience and EthicsScience in the Private InterestScience, Policy, and the Value-Free IdealScience, Seeds and CyborgsScratching the Surface of BioethicsSecular Philosophy and the Religious TemperamentSeeing the LightSelf-ConstitutionSelf-Made MadnessSelf-Trust and Reproductive AutonomySentimental RulesSex Fiends, Perverts, and PedophilesSex OffendersSex, Family, and the Culture WarsSexual DevianceSexual EthicsSexual PredatorsSexualized BrainsShaping Our SelvesShock TherapyShould I Medicate My Child?ShunnedSick to Death and Not Going to Take It AnymoreSickoSide EffectsSidewalk StoriesSister CitizenSkeptical FeminismSocial Inclusion of People with Mental IllnessSocial JusticeSociological Perspectives on the New GeneticsSome We Love, Some We Hate, Some We EatSovereign VirtueSpeech MattersSpiral of EntrapmentSplit DecisionsSticks and StonesStories MatterSubjectivity and Being SomebodySuffering, Death, and IdentitySuicide ProhibitionSurgery JunkiesSurgically Shaping ChildrenTaking Morality SeriouslyTaming the Troublesome ChildTechnology and the Good Life?TestimonyText and Materials on International Human RightsThe Aims of Higher EducationThe Almost MoonThe Altruistic BrainThe American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Forensic PsychiatryThe Animal ManifestoThe Animals' AgendaThe Art of LivingThe Autonomy of MoralityThe Beloved SelfThe Best Things in LifeThe Big FixThe Bioethics ReaderThe Biology and Psychology of Moral AgencyThe Blackwell Guide to Medical EthicsThe Body SilentThe BondThe Book of LifeThe Burden of SympathyThe Cambridge Companion to Virtue EthicsThe Cambridge Companion to Virtue EthicsThe Cambridge Textbook of BioethicsThe Case against Assisted SuicideThe Case Against PerfectionThe Case Against PunishmentThe Case for PerfectionThe Case of Terri SchiavoThe Challenge of Human RightsThe Code for Global EthicsThe Colonization Of Psychic SpaceThe Commercialization of Intimate LifeThe Common ThreadThe Connected SelfThe Constitution of AgencyThe Creation of PsychopharmacologyThe Criminal BrainThe Decency WarsThe Difficult-to-Treat Psychiatric PatientThe Disability PendulumThe Disability Rights Movement: From Charity to ConfrontationThe Domain of ReasonsThe Double-Edged HelixThe Duty to ProtectThe Emotional Construction of MoralsThe End of Ethics in a Technological SocietyThe End of Stigma?The Essentials of New York Mental Health LawThe Ethical BrainThe Ethical Dimensions of the Biological and Health SciencesThe Ethics of BioethicsThe Ethics of Human EnhancementThe Ethics of ParenthoodThe Ethics of SightseeingThe Ethics of the FamilyThe Ethics of the Family in SenecaThe Ethics of the LieThe Ethics of TransplantsThe Ethics of WarThe Ethics ToolkitThe Evolution of Mental Health LawThe Evolution of MoralityThe FamilyThe Fat Studies ReaderThe Forgiveness ProjectThe Form of Practical KnowledgeThe Fountain of YouthThe Freedom ParadoxThe Future of Assisted Suicide and EuthanasiaThe Future of Human NatureThe Good BookThe Good LifeThe Great BetrayalThe Handbook of Disability StudiesThe Healing VirtuesThe High Price of MaterialismThe History of Human RightsThe HorizonThe Idea of JusticeThe Ideal of NatureThe Illusion of Freedom and EqualityThe Immortal Life of Henrietta LacksThe Importance of Being UnderstoodThe Insanity OffenseThe Joy of SecularismThe Language PoliceThe Last Normal ChildThe Last UtopiaThe Limits of MedicineThe LobotomistThe Love CureThe Lucifer EffectThe Manual of EpictetusThe Mark of ShameThe Meaning of NiceThe Medicalization of SocietyThe Merck DruggernautThe Mind Has MountainsThe Modern Art of DyingThe Modern SavageThe Moral ArcThe Moral BrainThe Moral Demands of MemoryThe Moral FoolThe Moral MindThe Moral Psychology HandbookThe Moral, Social, and Commercial Imperatives of Genetic Testing and ScreeningThe Most Good You Can DoThe Myth of ChoiceThe Myth of the Moral BrainThe Nature of NormativityThe New Disability HistoryThe New Genetic MedicineThe New Religious IntoleranceThe Offensive InternetThe Origins of FairnessThe Oxford Handbook of Animal EthicsThe Oxford Handbook of Ethics at the End of LifeThe Perfect BabyThe Philosophical ParentThe Philosophy of NeedThe Philosophy of PornographyThe Philosophy of PsychiatryThe Politics Of LustThe Portable Ethicist for Mental Health Professionals The Power of Religion in the Public SphereThe Price of PerfectionThe Price of TruthThe Problem of PunishmentThe Prosthetic ImpulseThe Psychology of Good and EvilThe Psychology of Good and EvilThe PsychopathThe Purity MythThe Pursuit of PerfectionThe Relevance of Philosophy to LifeThe Right Road to Radical FreedomThe Right to Be ParentsThe Righteous MindThe Root of All EvilThe Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of EmpathyThe Rules of InsanityThe Second SexismThe Second-Person StandpointThe Silent World of Doctor and PatientThe Sleep of ReasonThe Social Psychology of Good and EvilThe Social Psychology of MoralityThe Social Psychology of MoralityThe Speed of DarkThe Stem Cell ControversyThe Stem Cell ControversyThe Story of Cruel and UnusualThe Story WithinThe Stubborn System of Moral ResponsibilityThe Suicide TouristThe Terrible GiftThe Theory of OptionsThe Therapy of DesireThe Trauma of Psychological TortureThe Trauma of Psychological TortureThe Triple HelixThe Trolley Problem MysteriesThe Trouble with DiversityThe Truth About the Drug CompaniesThe Ugly LawsThe Varieties of Religious ExperienceThe Virtue of Defiance and Psychiatric EngagementThe Virtues of FreedomThe Virtues of HappinessThe Virtuous Life in Greek EthicsThe Virtuous PsychiatristThe Voice of Breast Cancer in Medicine and BioethicsThe War Against BoysThe War for Children's MindsThe Whole ChildThe Woman RacketThe Worldwide Practice of TortureTherapy with ChildrenThieves of VirtueThree Generations, No ImbecilesTimes of Triumph, Times of DoubtTolerance Among The VirtuesTolerance and the Ethical LifeTolerationToxic PsychiatryTrauma, Truth and ReconciliationTreatment Kind and FairTrusting on the EdgeTry to RememberUltimate JudgementUnborn in the USA: Inside the War on AbortionUndermining ScienceUnderstanding AbortionUnderstanding CloningUnderstanding EmotionsUnderstanding EvilUnderstanding Kant's EthicsUnderstanding Moral ObligationUnderstanding Physician-Pharmaceutical Industry InteractionsUnderstanding TerrorismUnderstanding the GenomeUnderstanding the Stigma of Mental IllnessUnderstanding Treatment Without ConsentUnhingedUnprincipled VirtueUnsanctifying Human Life: Essays on EthicsUnspeakable Acts, Ordinary PeopleUp in FlamesUpheavals of ThoughtUsers and Abusers of PsychiatryValue-Free Science?Values and Psychiatric DiagnosisValues in ConflictVegetarianismViolence and Mental DisorderVirtue EthicsVirtue, Rules, and JusticeVirtue, Vice, and PersonalityVirtues and Their VicesVulnerability, Autonomy, and Applied EthicsWar Against the WeakWar, Torture and TerrorismWarrior's DishonourWeaknessWelfare and Rational CareWhat Genes Can't DoWhat Have We DoneWhat Is a Human?What Is Good and WhyWhat Is Good and WhyWhat Is the Good Life?What Price Better Health?What Should I Do?What We Owe to Each OtherWhat Would Aristotle Do?What's Good on TVWhat's Normal?What's Wrong with Children's RightsWhat's Wrong with Homosexuality?What's Wrong With Morality?When Is Discrimination Wrong?Who Holds the Moral High Ground?Who Owns YouWho Qualifies for Rights?Whose America?Whose View of Life?Why Animals MatterWhy Animals MatterWhy I Burned My Book and Other Essays on DisabilityWhy Not Kill Them All?Why Punish? How Much?Why Some Things Should Not Be for SaleWisdom, Intuition and EthicsWithout ConscienceWomen and Borderline Personality DisorderWomen and MadnessWondergenesWould You Kill the Fat Man?Wrestling with Behavioral GeneticsWriting About PatientsYou Must Be DreamingYour Genetic DestinyYour Inner FishYouth Offending and Youth Justice Yuck!
Judging from the number of books in the
Psychology/Self-Help sections of bookstores, the general public has a strong
interest in issues to do with mental health and clinical psychology. Academics in the fields of Philosophy and
Biomedical Ethics have, however, largely neglected the metaphysical,
conceptual, ethical and political issues to do with psychopathology that so
fascinate others. Philosophers have had
some well-publicized debates about the scientific status of psychoanalytic
theory, but these have been of merely academic or theoretical interest, since
in psychiatric practice psychoanalysis faded out decades ago. There has been a change of intellectual
climate in the last five or so years that philosophers and ethicists have
started to investigate clinical psychology as it is actually practiced. It is helpful to compare this book by
Jennifer Radden with one by Carl Elliott; both are important landmarks in the
development of the new field of philosophy of psychiatry.
Both books deal primarily with issues of the moral
rights and moral responsibilities of people with mental illnesses. But they have quite different styles. Raddens Divided Minds and Successive
Selves is aimed at an audience with philosophical training. It is academic in its approach, and pays
careful attention to detail. The actual
writing style is quite typical of modern academic philosophy, i.e., dry and
sometimes hard to read. Radden is prone
to clunky prose style, and her book would have benefited from more careful
attention from an editor. I even wonder
whether the font (Bembo) in which the book is printed is hard on the eyes: something
about the physical appearances of the pages makes the writing look
unapproachable to me. Elliott is a
better writer, and since The Rules of
Insanity is a slim 124 pages of text, it is a comparatively quick
read. His claims are easy to understand
and his arguments are straightforward.
The scope of the book is relatively narrow. In contrast, Raddens book is ambitious, covering a wide variety
of issues and fields of study. There is
no overall simple thesis for which she argues, and her book defies quick
While the subtitle of Raddens book is Ethical
Issues in Disorders of Identity and Personality, the book actually devotes
more space to discussing metaphysical issues, which are then used in arriving
at ethical conclusions. There are four
parts to the book, the first of which is devoted to setting out the basic
issues to do with understanding the differences between the unity of mind in
normal people and the disunity of mind in the various forms of
psychopathology. Radden is quite ready
to agree that these differences are real: she is not sympathetic to some of the
radical views of critics of psychiatry, who have claimed that there is no real
difference between sanity and insanity, or madness is just a label that society
uses to control deviancy. Although she
does say some things which might go against some psychiatric practices, she is
happy to stay within the mainstream.
Radden emphasizes that we need to be careful in our
characterization of normal minds. They
are not as unified as we might think.
However, there are still striking differences between the normal and the
pathological. The clearest case of
multiplicity within a mind is in dissociative identity disorder (DID),
popularly called multiple personalities.
Here there are different selves coexisting within one body. Radden does not go so far as to say that the
different selves are different people, but they collectively have significantly
more diversity among them than a normal person does in him or herself. Each self is a separate agent, with a
distinct personality, which persists over time (even though the self may not be
present all the time), and the subject (i.e. the collection of selves) appears
to experience unusual amnesia.
Armed with these criteria, she moves on to examine
other clinical phenomena, such as mood disorders and schizophrenia, in order to
determine the extent to which they also exhibit multiplicity. She points out that these illnesses do not,
as a rule, lead to profound personality changes. The personality change associated with mania can last for weeks
or months, and while there is no significant loss of memory, there is memory
distortion and selectivity. But
Radden's discussion of these cases is disappointingly short. Despite the fantastic array of real clinical
phenomena, she only considers in this part of the book one real life example of
schizophrenia. She concludes that it can make sense to say that during a acute
phase of the illness, we are dealing with a different self from the normal self
that previously existed, and will return when the illness is controlled.
Contexts of Responsibility
Part II of the book is the longest of the four, at
over 100 pages, divided into six chapters.
The main point of this part is to investigate the responsibility of the
successive selves we find in abnormal psychology for the actions of the person
they constitute. Radden says that there
is no simple rule with which we can judge the responsibility of a person with a
mental illness. Instead, we need to
specify the context in which we are concerned with responsibility. The approach used in psychotherapy, for
instance, will be quite different from that used in a court of law. In therapy, the different selves of a person
with DID will consider themselves quite separate from each other, and not
responsible for each others actions.
However, in a court of law, it is not practical to make such fine
distinctions, because there the bottom line is whether the defendant should be
found innocent, or found guilty and punished.
It is not feasible to find one self innocent and other guilty, even
supposing that we could be sure that the defendant was not faking multiple
Radden considers whether people with DID who have
committed crimes should be found not guilty on grounds on insanity, diminished
capacity, or other possible defenses linked to the disorder. She concludes that no such defense is
justifiable, although there might be good reason to reduce the punishment. Currently this is an issue of mainly
theoretical interest, since there have been very few cases of defendants trying
to avoid punishment on the grounds of having multiple personalities. It might become an issue of greater public
concern if such a defense becomes more common, but this seems unlikely given
the current public hostility to any insanity defenses, and the particular worry
that it is easy to fake the dissociation of identity.
A topic of more public concern is when it is morally
permissible to force a mentally ill person to undergo psychiatric
treatment. The law generally permits us
to hospitalize a person if she has a major mental illness and is a serious
danger to herself or to others. But
there are many more times when a person does not meet such stringent criteria,
and yet her family or friends are concerned enough to try to convince her to
seek treatment. When rational or
emotional persuasion fails, there is not much that people can do, since, at
least in America, so much emphasis is put on the right of citizens to be free
from interference. Can a moral case be
made for overriding this right in the case of people who are not dangerous but
whose lives are going severely awry because of their untreated mental illness?
Radden argues against various philosophers who have
tried to make such a case. It is hard to say that the mentally ill are
incompetent to run their own lives, because we have no clear criteria of
competence. If we force treatment on
one person on the grounds of incompetence, for making a disastrous life
decision, where can we draw the line?
Clearly there is a danger that government or the medical establishment
would start to have too much power over peoples lives.
Other proposals for justifying forced treatment are
that it is in the patients best interest, or that it is what the patient would
have wanted. Radden does an impressive
job in showing the problems that arise for these approaches. Neither does it work to argue that, by
making the patient take drugs or involuntarily hospitalizing her, we are
actually returning her to her true self, and so, despite appearances,
increasing her freedom. There are
enough difficulties with this idea that it fails to pass the crucial test of
being a solid argument. Radden insists
that if there are lingering questions about the soundness of the arguments, we
should stay on the side of liberty.
Sometimes it is not just the
family and friends of an ill person who wish she could get treatment. Sometimes she herself, before and after the
illness, wishes that she would get treatment when ill. In such cases, she might write instructions
ahead of time, while healthy, saying that she permits, or even demands, to be
forced to accept treatment. These have
been called Ulysses contracts.
Presumably they are a legal minefield, but Radden is not interested in
the legal aspects. She is concerned
about the moral legitimacy of these directives, and argues that unless the ill
person is actually self-destructive, we should not honor her previous request
to force treatment.
Her argument is subtle. We can view the situation in one of two ways. Either the contract-writing healthy self
counts as a different individual as the later irrational ill-self, or they are
the same. If they are different, then
what we have is one individual forcing another to get treatment, and this is
unfair. If, on the other hand, they are
the same individual, then that individual has the right to change her mind
about whether she wants treatment, and she should be able to refuse it. We think people have the right to make bad
choices, and the mentally ill should be no exception to this, no matter what
they previously instructed.
It is a standard liberal view that we can override a
persons wishes just when those wishes are likely to harm another. In a person with recurrent major mental
illness, understood on a successive-self analysis, when the ill-self threatens
suicide, this also threatens the healthy-self, who would re-emerge if the
illness was treated. We can interfere
with suicidal wishes when a person is mentally incompetent, but incompetence is
difficult to establish even in the suicidal.
On Raddens view, however, we dont need to resort to declaring the
ill-self incompetent, since her self-destruction can be prevented on other
grounds, i.e., the protection of the healthy-self. Here she is assuming that the healthy-self and the ill-self are
different individuals. The ill-self
might have the right to destroy itself, but it does not have the right to
destroy the healthy-self.
There are several problems with this argument, but I
will just mention one here. It proves
too much. For it would follow from this
analysis that the healthy-self does not have the right to destroy the ill-self. Of course, the healthy-self is not suicidal,
but in a sense, it wants to destroy the ill-self. The healthy-self has a right to exist, but the ill-self has equal
moral status, and so cannot be intentionally destroyed. A person who was successfully treated by
medication, for instance, would seem to have a responsibility to go off it
periodically in order to allow the ill-self some more time to exist. This conclusion is so absurd that it casts
doubt on Raddens successive-self analysis.
For the third part of the book, Radden obliquely
opposes postmodernists who advocate a multiplicity of self. She argues that being unified is generally
better than being disunified. This is
also relevant to therapists treating patients with DID: should they aim to
bring all the personalities together into one, or is it reasonable to allow
them to continue to coexist? Radden
favors the merger of the different personalities into one.
In making her argument over four chapters, Radden
goes into interesting details and thoughtful discussion. She tends not to take
strong stands in this part. But she
does argue that it makes sense to say a person is responsible for her past
actions, at least in some ways, even when she has gone through such severe
personality change that she is not the same self as she was previously. She concedes that in cases of extreme flux
and discontinuity, as found in DID, it hardly makes sense to use our normal
language to describe peoples lives.
But she thinks that in more moderate cases, it is at least possible to
apply the concepts to some degree. For example, we find no problem in saying a
person was trustworthy for some period of her life, but not during another
period. Radden points out that one can
have integrity through dramatic changes in oneself, if there is a continuity of
self-monitoring. Indeed, this is what
often goes on in therapy.
Metaphysics of Possession
In the fourth and final part of the book, Radden
delves into philosophy of mind and turns to the ways that minds can be divided
at one time. She starts off considering
whether there can be more than one center of awareness within a body at one
instant. Much of the supposed
behavioral evidence for this phenomenon is not conclusive, both in people with
DID and in hypnotic states, and in people who have had operations to sever most
of the neural connections joining their two brain hemispheres. She says it is possible to explain these
phenomena without recourse to hypothesizing a divided consciousness. She also examines a variety of other
psychological phenomena, such as thought insertion, depersonalization,
derealization, possession states, and out-of-body experiences as other possible
sources of evidence for divided consciousness.
Radden argues that they are cases of division, but this does not mean
that there are two separate independent centers of awareness. Rather, they involve a duality of experience
happening to one center of consciousness.
Finally, Radden considers the ways in which we can
see some parts of our minds as not really part of us at all. This is to do with the distinction between I
and not-I. For instance, schizophrenics
sometimes experience auditory hallucinations, where they hear voices as if they
are coming from someone next to them.
The voice sounds as if it is not their own, but belongs to someone else. In these cases, the hallucinators think that
it does really belong to someone else.
Radden says this strange phenomenon is not a matter of people failing to
realize who is having the experience, but rather a failure to realize that they
are the actual originators of the experience.
In this kind of work, Radden is doing a form of conceptual tidying of
our metaphysical understanding of the mind.
It is worthy work, although it is hard to make it exciting to those who
are not predisposed to be interested in such fine detail.
Falling Between Several
Divided Minds and Successive
impressive for its relevance to current philosophical debates and shows how
much the philosophers writing about subjectivity and consciousness are missing
when they neglect issues arising from the study of psychopathology. But philosophers will criticize the book for
not doing into enough detail, and its overly brief discussions of the ideas of
other philosophers. The book may be
interesting to philosophically-minded psychologists and psychiatrists who are
interested in gaining a clearer conceptual understanding of the phenomena they
deal with in their everyday practices.
But unfortunately it is unlikely to appeal to a general audience. Apart from the stylistic problems and the
use of philosophical jargon, the issues it deals with tend to be abstruse, and
Radden shies away from dealing the implications of her ideas for current social
issues. This is a pity, because the
work she has done is actually original and important, and deserves to gain wide
attention. I hope that she will in the
next few years write a sequel to Divided Minds and Successive Selves,
which would be aimed at a wider audience, and would engage more in the debates
that rage over social and legal policy.