email page print pageAll Topic Reviews
50 Reasons People Give for Believing in a God50 Voices of DisbeliefA Companion to Buddhist PhilosophyA Companion to Muslim EthicsA Frightening LoveA People's History of ChristianityAdieu to GodAn Ethics for TodayAristotle's ChildrenAugustine's "Confessions"Bad FaithBehind the GospelsBig DreamsBig GodsBody Piercing Saved My LifeBrains, Buddhas, and BelievingBrief Inquiry into the Meaning of Sin and FaithBuddhism and ScienceBuddhist Boot CampConfucianismConfucianismConfucius and ConfucianismContemplative ScienceCorporal Punishment, Religion, and United States Public SchoolsCourage to SurrenderCross and KhoraDarwin's Gift to Science and ReligionDarwin, God and the Meaning of LifeDeath and the AfterlifeDebating DesignDeeper Than DarwinDivinity of DoubtEmbracing MindEncountering the DharmaEngaging BuddhismEsalenEscape Your Own PrisonEvidence for PsiEvilEvolution and ReligionExplorations in Neuroscience, Psychology and ReligionFaithFaith and Wisdom in ScienceFingerprints of GodFor The Bible Tells Me SoForgivenessFrom Shame to SinGod & TherapyGod Is Not GreatGod Is Not OneGod: The Failed HypothesisHereticHidden DimensionsHooked!Hours with the MysticsHow to See Yourself As You Really AreHow Would Buddha Act?Incorporating Spirituality in Counseling and PsychotherapyInto Great SilenceIslam and the Future of Tolerance: A DialogueJewish DharmaLife After FaithLiving DeeplyLiving with a Wild GodLiving with DarwinMaking Chastity SexyMedicine and Health Care in Early ChristianityMedicine and ReligionMedicine of the PersonMysticism & SpaceNature and the Human SoulNothingOn Life After DeathPanpsychism and the Religious AttitudePathways to SpiritualityPeaceful Death, Joyful RebirthPhilosophers without GodsPhilosophical Myths of the FallPorn UniversityPray the Gay AwayPsychotherapy without the SelfRadical GraceReason, Faith, and RevolutionRecruiting Young LoveReligion without GodReligious and Spiritual Issues in Psychiatric DiagnosisSaving GodScience and NonbeliefScience and Religion at the CrossroadsScience and SpiritualityScience vs. ReligionSecular Philosophy and the Religious TemperamentSelf Hypnosis for Cosmic ConsciousnessSelf, No Self?Sex and the Soul, Updated EditionSmile of the BuddhaSpirit, Mind, and BrainSuperstitionTen Lectures on Psychotherapy and SpiritualityThe Accidental MindThe Belief InstinctThe Bodhisattva's BrainThe Cambridge Companion to AtheismThe Cambridge Companion to Science and ReligionThe Case for GodThe Chosen OneThe Dao of NeuroscienceThe Dark Night of the SoulThe Delight of Being OrdinaryThe Fundamentalist MindsetThe God DebatesThe God GeneThe Hero with a Thousand FacesThe Improbability of GodThe Joy of SecularismThe Language God TalksThe Language of GodThe Meaning of BeliefThe MiracleThe New AtheismThe New Religious IntoleranceThe Philosophy of ReligionThe Power of FaithThe Power of ForgivenessThe Power of Religion in the Public SphereThe Psychology of Religious FundamentalismThe Psychology of SpiritualityThe Puppet and the DwarfThe Secular OutlookThe Sense of SelfThe Spirit of the BuddhaThe Spirit of Tibetan BuddhismThe Tibetan Book of the DeadThe Trauma of Everyday LifeThe Watkins Dictionary of Religions and Secular FaithsThe Watkins Dictionary of SymbolsTheology, Psychology and the Plural SelfThoughts Without A ThinkerTop SecretUnifying HinduismWays of KnowingWhat Is Buddhist Enlightenment?What Should I Believe?When the Impossible HappensWhy I Left, Why I StayedWilliam James on Ethics and FaithWriting as a Sacred PathYoga, Karma, and RebirthZealot
The Cambridge Companion to Atheism -- an anthology edited by Michael Martin -- aims to acquaint its reader with atheism's "history, present social context, legal implications, supporting arguments, implications for morality, and relation to other perspectives" (most notably, to feminism and postmodernism) (1). The anthology is addressed to a "general reader" as well as to an "advanced student," but is supposed to serve as an "introduction to atheism" (ibid.)
Gavin Hyman, in one of the opening essays that provides the "background" for the discussion of atheism, says that "atheism defines itself in terms of that which it is denying" [i.e., theism] (28). (In his "Atheism in Modern History," Hyman goes on to analyze the modern atheism, which was shaped in the context of modern philosophy, e.g., Descartes, Locke, Kant, and Marx.) This understanding of atheism -- as historically and conceptually related and opposed to theism -- proves to be the leitmotif of the anthology. As the table of contents shows, the anthology is divided into three sections: (i) Background (consisting of three essays), (ii) The Case against Theism (that contains nine), and (iii) Implications (with its six contributions).
The main section of the anthology -- The Case against Theism -- covers a number of topics in philosophy of religion (especially as they are developed in Anglo-American thought), ranging from the arguments for the existence of God, to the relation between atheism and other branches of philosophy such as philosophy of mind ("Naturalism and Physicalism" by Evan Fales), philosophy of science ("Atheism and Evolution" by Daniel Dennett and "Kalam Cosmological Arguments for Atheism" by Quentin Smith), and ethics (e.g., "The Autonomy of Ethics" by David Brink). With the exception of William Lane Craig's "Theistic Critiques of Atheism," this section of the anthology makes a case for atheism and conceives of this case (largely) to be merely a case against theism. Thus, most essays in this section are written in dialogue with prominent arguments for theism, especially the arguments developed by Alvin Plantinga. In fact, in order to give justice to this section of the anthology, the reader appears to be almost required to have read Plantinga's e.g., God, Freedom and Evil and Warranted Christian Belief.
While the bulk of the Cambridge Companion to Atheism addresses the philosophical problems with theism, its 'dialogue' with theism remains one-sided, since the anthology does not contain a set of contributions in defense of theistic view. No doubt, it can be said that in this consists the difference between an anthology on atheism and an introductory anthology to, say, the philosophy of religion, which (in some ways) would serve as a more comprehensive text addressing the arguments for and against various religious beliefs. But both a "general reader" and an "advanced student" of atheism might be dissatisfied to find in The Cambridge Companion to Atheism exactly one half of a standard anthology on philosophy of religion. That does not make this 'half' any more profound than a collection of contributions contained in a standard reader in the philosophy of religion; The Cambridge Companion to Atheism merely excludes the other side of the debate -- the contributions for theists' position that an anthology in philosophy of religion usually does include.
Although the history of atheism is a history of a-theism, it seems appropriate now to strive to understand atheism in more than relative terms. In his "Atheism and Religion," Michael Martin briefly discusses the claim made by Madelyn Murray O'Hair that "atheism [is] not the religion of the future" (220). Leaving aside the point of Martin's discussion (that atheism "fails to meet the conditions of being a religion"), we might want to take to heart the spirit of O'Hair's claim -- the understanding of atheism as a positive worldview that goes beyond the intellectualist rejections of the traditional theistic arguments. Unfortunately, The Cambridge Companion to Atheism does not offer a discussion of atheism in this sense.
The third section of the anthology -- Implications -- fares better in this respect. While this section does not develop a systematic positive understanding of atheism, its contributions explore the relation between atheism, on the one hand, and several other "perspectives," on the other. Some of the questions that this section addresses are: 'Does being a feminist require that one be an atheist?' (by Christine Overall), 'Does postmodernism imply atheism?' (by John Caputo), and 'Who Are They -- Atheists?' (by Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi). The answers to these questions that the authors argue for are the following: according to Overall, "there are several reasons for feminists to be atheists" (from arguments against the accepted conception of God to the re-cast argument from evil). Caputo presents an analysis of both postmodernism and atheism that challenges the naïve straightforward equation of postmodernism and atheism -- according to Caputo, "postmodernism is a sustained attempt to displace a fixed categorical opposition of theism and atheism" (279). Finally, Beit-Hallahmi argues that, based on sociological data, we can come up with "a tentative psychological profile [of atheists]," according to which atheists are "less authoritarian and suggestible, less dogmatic, less prejudiced, more tolerant or others, law-abiding, compassionate, conscientious, and well educated. They are of high intelligence, and many are committed to the intellectual and scholarly life. In short, they are good to have as neighbors" (313). These arguments are controversial, but they open the door to a philosophical discussion concerning atheism. Most importantly, they conceive of atheism as more than a set of negative arguments against the soundness of theist's position.
I have argued that an "advanced student" (acquainted with philosophy of religion) is likely to be disappointed by The Cambridge Companion to Atheism since the anthology contains merely the well-rehearsed arguments against theism (without the theist's side of the debate) and does not paint a picture of atheism as an intellectual and ethical movement in its own right. Let me add that a "general reader" would not for the most part find the anthology a desired reading either. Most contributions are written by professional philosophers to professional philosophers. They presuppose a fair fluency with respect to the traditional arguments, concepts, and even texts in the history of philosophy and in contemporary Anglo-American philosophy of religion.
© 2007 Tatiana Patrone
Tatiana Patrone, Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Montclair State University, NJ.