email page print pageAll Topic Reviews
50 Reasons People Give for Believing in a God50 Voices of DisbeliefA Companion to Buddhist PhilosophyA Companion to Muslim EthicsA Frightening LoveA People's History of ChristianityAdieu to GodAn Ethics for TodayAristotle's ChildrenAugustine's "Confessions"Bad FaithBehind the GospelsBig DreamsBig GodsBody Piercing Saved My LifeBrains, Buddhas, and BelievingBrief Inquiry into the Meaning of Sin and FaithBuddhism and ScienceBuddhist Boot CampConfucianismConfucianismConfucius and ConfucianismContemplative ScienceCorporal Punishment, Religion, and United States Public SchoolsCourage to SurrenderCross and KhoraDarwin's Gift to Science and ReligionDarwin, God and the Meaning of LifeDeath and the AfterlifeDebating DesignDeeper Than DarwinDivinity of DoubtEmbracing MindEncountering the DharmaEngaging BuddhismEsalenEscape Your Own PrisonEvidence for PsiEvilEvolution and ReligionExplorations in Neuroscience, Psychology and ReligionFaithFaith and Wisdom in ScienceFingerprints of GodFor The Bible Tells Me SoForgivenessFrom Shame to SinGod & TherapyGod Is Not GreatGod Is Not OneGod: The Failed HypothesisHereticHidden DimensionsHooked!Hours with the MysticsHow to See Yourself As You Really AreHow Would Buddha Act?Incorporating Spirituality in Counseling and PsychotherapyInto Great SilenceIslam and the Future of Tolerance: A DialogueJewish DharmaLife After FaithLiving DeeplyLiving with a Wild GodLiving with DarwinMaking Chastity SexyMedicine and Health Care in Early ChristianityMedicine and ReligionMedicine of the PersonMysticism & SpaceNature and the Human SoulNothingOn Life After DeathPanpsychism and the Religious AttitudePathways to SpiritualityPeaceful Death, Joyful RebirthPhilosophers without GodsPhilosophical Myths of the FallPorn UniversityPray the Gay AwayPsychotherapy without the SelfRadical GraceReason, Faith, and RevolutionRecruiting Young LoveReligion without GodReligious and Spiritual Issues in Psychiatric DiagnosisSaving GodScience and NonbeliefScience and Religion at the CrossroadsScience and SpiritualityScience vs. ReligionSecular Philosophy and the Religious TemperamentSelf Hypnosis for Cosmic ConsciousnessSelf, No Self?Sex and the Soul, Updated EditionSmile of the BuddhaSpirit, Mind, and BrainSuperstitionTen Lectures on Psychotherapy and SpiritualityThe Accidental MindThe Belief InstinctThe Bodhisattva's BrainThe Cambridge Companion to AtheismThe Cambridge Companion to Science and ReligionThe Case for GodThe Chosen OneThe Dao of NeuroscienceThe Dark Night of the SoulThe Delight of Being OrdinaryThe Fundamentalist MindsetThe God DebatesThe God GeneThe Hero with a Thousand FacesThe Improbability of GodThe Joy of SecularismThe Language God TalksThe Language of GodThe Meaning of BeliefThe MiracleThe New AtheismThe New Religious IntoleranceThe Philosophy of ReligionThe Power of FaithThe Power of ForgivenessThe Power of Religion in the Public SphereThe Psychology of Religious FundamentalismThe Psychology of SpiritualityThe Puppet and the DwarfThe Secular OutlookThe Sense of SelfThe Spirit of the BuddhaThe Spirit of Tibetan BuddhismThe Tibetan Book of the DeadThe Trauma of Everyday LifeThe Watkins Dictionary of Religions and Secular FaithsThe Watkins Dictionary of SymbolsTheology, Psychology and the Plural SelfThoughts Without A ThinkerTop SecretUnifying HinduismWays of KnowingWhat Is Buddhist Enlightenment?What Should I Believe?When the Impossible HappensWhy I Left, Why I StayedWilliam James on Ethics and FaithWriting as a Sacred PathYoga, Karma, and RebirthZealot
With the exception of Bucke's Cosmic Consciousness which is more evolutionary, Vaughan's 1856 work is the most sophisticatedly literary, if evasivly serpentine, of the chronological works on mysticism, whether interpretive survey or collection of readings. The general public no doubt only knows Evelyn Underwood's overestimated Mysticism. The more knowledgeable may prefer Walter Stace's Teachings of the Mystics or Bruno Borchert's more recent bottle of cognac, Mysticism.
It is easier to list the categories of mystics Vaughan covers than to explain either his method or his point of view. The first of the "two volumes in one," after etymology, and talk of formalistic kinds (36) of mysticism, theopathetic, with its transitive and intransitive subclasses, theosophic, and theurgic, discusses almost nothing east of Greece, or, later, in the second volume, beyond the Sufis. He next presents Plato and his aftermath among the western and some eastern ecclesiastics, with deservedly important focus on the Areopagite Pseudo-Dionysius up through some Franco-Italian exemplars and a lot of the early Germans. The second volume begins with the Reformation to discuss, among others, the alchemists, Behmen (Jacob Boehme), Rosicrucians, revivals of neo-Platonism, Quietism against which he burns, Swedenborg, relations with Romanticism, and chapters in resume. Vaughan features some mystics that might escape even the seasoned mysticism surfer: a second St. Victor, Adolf Arnstein, Brigitta, various Lutheran mystics, Joana Leade, and Antoinette Bourignon.
Some may grumble over his orthodox rejections of "error": mysticism [xxvii] is "confessedly more or less a mistake," but if it is (xxxiii) "often a dream, it is commonly a dream in the right direction," being a significant chapter in the story of humanity. It is (11) a "mysterious religious affection" which he ultimately defines (22) as "that form of error which mistakes for a divine manifestation the operations of a merely human faculty." Thus, in a few fell swoops he misconceives the butterfly not yet pinned of mysticism as necessarily religious, never considering, except for being somehow (21) "incorporated in . . . atheism," this or agnostic versions that must have been known to him, e.g., The Story of My Heart by the naturalist Richard Jefferies. He also depreciates thereby as mere faculty the human body.
The method he uses to forward an argument whose purpose has to be teased from the text is that of the dramatic dialogue in which the Socrates speaking the author's voice is named Atherton, uniting Gower the encyclopedist with Willoughby the literarian and minor others, all playing claques for Vaughan-Atherton. Ultimately it resolves itself in a metaphoric anti-Götterdämmerung (368-74) where the openly male-chauvinist author of another age makes triumph Sun over Flame, living scripture, as it were, of a new Adam and Eve, over dark mystical revelation in a way that recalls the spirit of "Don Juan in Hell" from Shaw's "Man and Superman." There he wants to put Intuition and Imagination on one side and Reason on the other, contradictorily making Understanding (361) mean reasoning, deliberation, judgment with Coleridge, yet later (365) opposing it to Reason, in a way we moderns call right brain versus left, heart versus head. That Weber's charismatic authority as personal revelation historically transmutes to legal-rational scripture escapes him as it did not Bucke who knew that non-institutional charismatic mystics and prophets simmer what become encrusted texts. As son Wycliffe's helpful 1879 preface to the third edition, not available in this 1856 version, implies, the frustrated father's inner playwright interwove Deipnosophist after-dinner drama within the increasingly synthesized text that added revealing points in the form of chapter epigrams, brief textual quotes, and footnotes too long spilled over as endnotes, where much German and Latin, along with a little Greek and Spanish, quotation is left either raw or occasionally rendered in English, at least by paraphrase. So you may to a point read it as a novel.
Overall, the text may strike the motivated or educated reader as wordily nineteenth-century and remarkably unclear as to author's intent despite the philosophic clues he strews about. They say that the similarly baggaged Underhill, not so burdened with Latin and especially the Greek that went out of style by the turn into her half-century, hated Vaughan. His historical-empirical and skeptical though no less doctrinaire, rationalism slapped the blush out of the cheeks of this proto-feminist. "So what would make me," you ask, "subject myself to such opportunities for mental frustration?" Exactly this: texts and names like the ones I've mentioned offer a cornucopia from which to choose material for your own joyful self-development. A mature, efficient reader learns never to read anything slavishly from cover to cover, certainly before finding a lodestar author and companion for the road. So choose, sister and brother, just those fruits from the horn that nourish you, including fruit of your own creation, fearing not hoary tomes like Vaughan's that inform--we deceitfully say "anticipate"--subsequent thinkers such as Underhill and Happold, Stace and Borchert, not to mention the stand-alone Bucke.
©2007 Anthony P. Bober
A.P. Bober has studied a psychology spanning Skinner and a humanistic-clinical view based on existential phenomenology and had been a PhD candidate in a substantive yet philosophic European-based sociology including the "critical" view. His teaching augmented courses in group theory/"small-group developmental dynamics" (lab) while introducing "sociology of knowledge" and "issues in biological anthropology," with publications in the first two fields. Currently he is writing a book on mystical experience as metaphorically tied to neuroendocrinology.