email page print pageAll Topic Reviews
A Companion to GenethicsA Companion to GenethicsA Cooperative SpeciesA Mind So RareA Natural History of RapeAcquiring GenomesAdapting MindsAgeing, Health and CareAlas, Poor DarwinAn Introduction to Evolutionary EthicsAncient Bodies, Modern LivesAnimal ArchitectsAping MankindAre We Hardwired?Bang!BehavingBeyond EvolutionBeyond GeneticsBlood MattersBody BazaarBoneBrain Evolution and CognitionBrain StormBrave New BrainBrave New WorldsChoosing ChildrenCloneCloningConceptual Issues in Evolutionary BiologyConsciousness EvolvingContemporary Debates in Philosophy of BiologyControlling Our DestiniesCooperation and Its EvolutionCreatures of AccidentDarwin Loves YouDarwin's Brave New WorldDarwin's Gift to Science and ReligionDarwin's UniverseDarwin's WormsDarwinian ConservatismDarwinian PsychiatryDarwinism and its DiscontentsDarwinism as ReligionDebating DesignDecoding DarknessDefenders of the TruthDo We Still Need Doctors?Doubting Darwin?Early WarningEngineering the Human GermlineEnhancing EvolutionEnoughEntwined LivesEthical Issues in Human CloningEthical Issues in the New GeneticsEvil GenesEvolutionEvolutionEvolution and Human BehaviorEvolution and Human BehaviorEvolution and Human Sexual BehaviorEvolution and LearningEvolution and ReligionEvolution and the Human MindEvolution in MindEvolution, Gender, and RapeEvolution: The Modern SynthesisEvolutionary Ethics and Contemporary BiologyEvolutionary Origins of MoralityEvolutionary PsychiatryEvolutionary PsychologyEvolutionary Psychology and ViolenceEvolutionary Psychology as Maladapted PsychologyExploding the Gene MythFaces of Huntington'sFlesh of My FleshFrom Chance to ChoiceFrom Darwin to HitlerGenesGenes in ConflictGenes on the CouchGenes, Environment, and PsychopathologyGenes, Environment, and PsychopathologyGenes, Women, EqualityGenetic Nature/CultureGenetic PoliticsGenetic ProspectsGenetic ProspectsGenetic SecretsGenetics of Criminal and Antisocial BehaviourGenetics of Mental DisordersGenetics of Original SinGenetics of Original SinGenomeGenomeGenome: Updated EditionGenomes and What to Make of ThemGlowing GenesHow Women Got Their Curves and Other Just-So StoriesHuman CloningHuman Evolution, Reproduction, and MoralityImproving Nature?In Our Own ImageIn Pursuit of the GeneIn the Name of GodIngenious GenesInheritanceInside the Human GenomeInside the O'BriensIntegrating Evolution and DevelopmentIntelligence, Race, and GeneticsIs Human Nature Obsolete?Language OriginsLess Than HumanLiberal EugenicsLiving with Our GenesMaking Genes, Making WavesMaking Sense of EvolutionMan As The PrayerMean GenesMenMood GenesMoral OriginsMothers and OthersNature Via NurtureNever Let Me GoNot By Genes AloneOf Flies, Mice, and MenOn the Origin of StoriesOrigin of MindOrigins of Human NatureOrigins of PsychopathologyOur Posthuman FuturePhilosophy of BiologyPlaying God?Playing God?Portraits of Huntington'sPrimates and PhilosophersPromiscuityPsychiatric Genetics and GenomicsPsychologyQuality of Life and Human DifferenceRe-creating MedicineRedesigning HumansResearch Advances in Genetics and GenomicsResponsible GeneticsResponsible GeneticsScience, Seeds and CyborgsSex and WarSociological Perspectives on the New GeneticsStrange BedfellowsStrange BehaviorSubjects of the WorldSubordination and DefeatThe Age of EmpathyThe Agile GeneThe Ape and the Sushi MasterThe Biotech CenturyThe Blank SlateThe Book of LifeThe Bridge to HumanityThe Case Against PerfectionThe Case for PerfectionThe Case of the Female OrgasmThe Century of the GeneThe Common ThreadThe Concept of the Gene in Development and EvolutionThe Debated MindThe Double-Edged HelixThe Epidemiology of SchizophreniaThe Ethics of Human CloningThe Evolution of CooperationThe Evolution of MindThe Evolution of MindThe Evolved ApprenticeThe Evolving WorldThe Fact of EvolutionThe Folly of FoolsThe Future of Human NatureThe God GeneThe Immortal Life of Henrietta LacksThe Impact of the GeneThe Innate MindThe Innate MindThe Innate Mind: Volume 3The Limits and Lies of Human Genetic ResearchThe Lives of the BrainThe Maladapted MindThe Meme MachineThe Misunderstood GeneThe Moral, Social, and Commercial Imperatives of Genetic Testing and ScreeningThe Most Dangerous AnimalThe New Genetic MedicineThe Nurture AssumptionThe Origin and Evolution of CulturesThe Origins of FairnessThe Paradoxical PrimateThe Perfect BabyThe Robot's RebellionThe Shape of ThoughtThe Shattered SelfThe Stem Cell ControversyThe Story WithinThe Stuff of LifeThe Talking ApeThe Temperamental ThreadThe Terrible GiftThe Theory of OptionsThe Top 10 Myths About EvolutionThe Triple HelixThe Triumph of SociobiologyThe Woman Who Walked into the SeaTwinsUnderstanding CloningUnderstanding the GenomeUnnatural SelectionUnto OthersUp From DragonsWar Against the WeakWhat Genes Can't DoWhat It Means to Be 98 Percent ChimpanzeeWho Owns YouWhose View of Life?Why Evolution Is TrueWhy Think? WondergenesWrestling with Behavioral GeneticsYour Genetic Destiny
Selfish genetic elements? Certain
truths are rather disenchanting. We, as living organisms, never asked for such
a fate; a destiny of molecular control. And yet, such a fate is that we are
getting more and more comfortable with each day. If we are uncomfortable with
our genetic materialism, perhaps it is because it trumps the simplicity of our
former spiritual materialism? Alas, our pragmatic preoccupation with genetics
reflects our thirst for immortality, which is proportional to our disdain for
reality, evinced by our penchant for entertainment.
Burt and Trivers continue the
postmodern tradition of unraveling genetic Code: the mother of all Codes, no?
Another thread loosed from the nucleic bird's
nest of our basis. To speak in terms of interests, we can say that the 'interests'
of the Code, or more specifically 'selfish genetic elements', do not converge
at the level of the individual organism, but rather at the level of the Code
itself. Biologists, for some time now, have referred to selfish genes and
such. Burt and Trivers are careful to ensure there is no misunderstanding of
the terminology they use:
The term "selfish gene"
was first introduced as the title of a popular book by Dawkins (1976) to
capture the increasingly gene-centered view of evolution that developed during
the 20th century; he used it to refer to all genes. But genes that
affect other individuals can be cooperative, altruistic, and even spiteful,
while within individuals most genes are cooperative. Thus, in the scientific
literature "selfish gene" is now used almost exclusively to refer to
the minority of genes that spread at a cost to the organism. To be more
inclusive about the underlying molecular structure, which can range from a gene
fragment to a complete chromosome, or set of chromosomes, we prefer the more
general term "selfish genetic element" (Werren et al.1988).
Obviously, in using the term, no comment is being made on the morality of the
DNA concerned. Other authors have used "outlaw gene" (Alexander and
Borgia 1978), "ultraselfish gene" (Crow 1988) and "self-promoting
genetic element" (Hurst et al. 1996a) to denote virtually identical concepts,
and long ago Ostergren (1945) referred to B chromosomes as "parasitic."
Terminology aside, what is at stake here is the concept.
Code can act in ways so as to render the appearance of a behavior we can
anthropically call 'selfish'. Sections of Code can seek to replicate
themselves at the expense of everything else, even the body they occupy. Burt
and Trivers' text deals mainly with a review of biology we understand thus far
with regard to genetic selfishness, considered from a variety of structural and
mechanistic perspectives (molecular, cytogenetic, genetic, physiological,
behavioral, comparative, populational, evolutionary, etc.) They collect and
consider major categories of selfish Code. Despite the noted conceptual change
in usage of the term 'selfish' with regard to Dawkins' lexicon, Burt and
Trivers' work is related to the work of Dawkins as stated in The Selfish
Gene (1976)--and in the follow-up to that book, entitled The Extended
Phenotype (1982). Dawkins:
It is legitimate to speak of
adaptations as being 'for the benefit of something,' but that something is best
not seen as the individual organism. It is a smaller unit, which I call the
active germ line replicators. The most important kind of replicator is the
gene or small genetic fragment. Replicators are not, of course, selected
directly, but by proxy; they are judged by their phenotypic effects. Although
for some purposes it is convenient to think of these phenotypic effects as
being packaged together in discrete 'vehicles' such as individual organisms,
this is not fundamentally necessary. Rather, the replicator should be thought
of as having extended phenotypic effects, consisting of all its effects on the
world at large, not just its effects on the individual body in which it happens
to be sitting (Richard Dawkins, The Extended Phenotype, Oxford; Oxford
UP (1999), p. 4)
So where Dawkins' general theory is focused upon selective pressures,
the evolution of organisms, and a "gene's eye point of view," vis-à-vis
Code within and as vehicular bodies, all considered from a rather philosophical
point of view, Burt and Trivers' general review is more of a technical
rendering, which systematically considers circumstances wherein genetic
elements conflict intragenomically, and then 'selfishly' act to transmit
themselves, often spreading with detriment to the organism.
Burt and Trivers' treatise confronts us with a
myriad of genetic elements that fall into the category of 'selfish.' For
example, the 't haplotype' in mice "disables sperm not containing
it and thus gains an advantage (drives) in single inseminations of
females" (p. 19).Another example
is within the species Saccharomyces cerevisae (baker's yeast), wherein certain
mutant 'petite' strains can derive from mutant mitochondria showing selfish
drive (transmission greater than 50%) (p. 147). And potentially most
interesting are the 'transposable elements, ' the most common selfish genetic
material, which act as 'mobile DNA, ' "integrating themselves into novel
places in the genome," whereas other genetic elements generally compete
for a single location in a genome (p. 228). Transposable elements are even "capable
of moving between species."
One of the most interesting insights to be derived
from all of this is that "from an evolutionary perspective, these elements
are to a degree their own independent life forms, sometimes even with their own
distinct evolutionary histories, always with genetic interests that diverge
from those of the rest of the organism" (p. 475). Subsequently, we are
then faced with the idea that life's individual and substantial realities,
however 'real' they may seem, resist cohesion internally. In other words, "the
unity of the organism is an approximation" (p. 475). When the technical
and philosophical unity of the organism is in serious question, and at best an "approximation,"
perhaps we are then in a position to consider the reality of life's fate, which
seems rather simply, to evolve, rather than maintain a universally stable form.
The naturally selective process we associate with organisms competing within an
environment also exerts pressure within the individual on the order of the Code
itself: genetic material competing in living bodies.
Burt and Trivers' Genes in Conflict is an
important contribution to biology and to the humanities: for biology, because
it collects and represents a comprehensive source of information on the
developing understanding of selfish Code; for the humanities, because it
forces a reconceptualization of what all of 'life' is, and then perhaps, what
it might become.
© 2006 Nicholas Ruiz III
Nicholas Ruiz III was born in
New York City and is a doctoral candidate in the Interdisciplinary Program in
the Humanities at Florida State University. His work has appeared in Noema
Tecnologie e Società, Rhizomes.net, Media/Culture.org.au,
International Journal of Baudrillard Studies, Reconstruction,
Resistance and elsewhere. He is also the editor of Kritikos.