email page print pageAll Topic Reviews
A Basic Theory of NeuropsychoanalysisA Cursing Brain?A Dream of Undying FameA Map of the MindAfter LacanAgainst AdaptationAgainst FreudAn Anatomy of AddictionAnalytic FreudAndré Green at the Squiggle FoundationAnger, Madness, and the DaimonicAnna FreudAnna Freud: A BiographyApproaching PsychoanalysisAttachment and PsychoanalysisBadiouBecoming a SubjectBefore ForgivingBerlin PsychoanalyticBetween Emotion and CognitionBeyond GenderBeyond SexualityBeyond the Pleasure PrincipleBiology of FreedomBoundaries and Boundary Violations in PsychoanalysisBuilding on BionCare of the PsycheCarl JungCassandra's DaughterCherishmentConfusion of TonguesContemporary Psychoanalysis and the Legacy of the Third ReichCrucial Choices, Crucial ChangesCulture and Conflict in Child and Adolescent Mental HealthDarwin's WormsDesert Islands and Other Texts (1953-1974)Dispatches from the Freud WarsDoes the Woman Exist?Doing Psychoanalysis in TehranDreaming and Other Involuntary MentationDreaming by the BookEnergy Psychology InteractiveEqualsErrant SelvesEthics and the Discovery of the UnconsciousEthics Case Book of the American Psychoanalytic AssociationFairbairn's Object Relations Theory in the Clinical SettingFed with Tears -- Poisoned with MilkFeminism and Its DiscontentsForms of Intersubjectivity in Infant Reasearch and Adult TreatmentFour Lessons of PsychoanalysisFratricide in the Holy LandFreudFreudFreudFreudFreudFreudFreud and the Question of PseudoscienceFreud As PhilosopherFreud at 150Freud's AnswerFreud's WizardFreud, the Reluctant PhilosopherFrom Classical to Contemporary PsychoanalysisFundamentals of Psychoanalytic TechniqueGenes on the CouchGoing SaneHans BellmerHappiness, Death, and the Remainder of LifeHate and Love in Psychoanalytical InstitutionsHatred and ForgivenessHealing the Soul in the Age of the BrainHeinz KohutHeinz KohutHidden MindsHistory of ShitHope and Dread in PsychoanalysisImagination and Its PathologiesImagine There's No WomanIn Freud's TracksIn SessionIn the Floyd ArchivesIntimaciesIntimate RevoltIrrationalityIs Oedipus Online?Jacques LacanJacques Lacan and the Freudian Practice of PsychoanalysisJung and the Making of Modern PsychologyJung Stripped BareKilling FreudLacanLacanLacanLacan and Contemporary FilmLacan at the SceneLacan For BeginnersLacan in AmericaLacan TodayLacan's Seminar on AnxietyLawLearning from Our MistakesLove's ExecutionerMad Men and MedusasMale Female EmailMelanie KleinMemoirs of My Nervous IllnessMental SlaveryMind to MindMixing MindsMoral StealthMourning and ModernityMovies and the MindMurder in ByzantiumNew Studies of Old VillainsNocturnesNoir AnxietyOn Being Normal and Other DisordersOn BeliefOn IncestOn Not Being Able to SleepOn the Freud WatchOn the Way HomeOpen MindedOpera's Second DeathOvercoming Destructive Beliefs, Feelings, and BehaviorsPhenomology & Lacan on Schizophrenia, After the Decade of the BrainPhilosophical Counselling and the UnconsciousPractical Psychoanalysis for Therapists and PatientsPsychiatry, Psychoanalysis, And The New Biology Of MindPsychoanalysisPsychoanalysis and Narrative MedicinePsychoanalysis and NeurosciencePsychoanalysis and the Philosophy of SciencePsychoanalysis as Biological SciencePsychoanalysis at the MarginsPsychoanalysis at the MarginsPsychoanalysis in a New LightPsychoanalysis in FocusPsychology, Psychotherapy, Psychoanalysis, and the Politics of Human RelationshipsPsychotherapy As PraxisPutnam CampQuestions for FreudRe-Inventing the SymptomReading Seminar XXReinventing the SoulRelational Theory and the Practice of PsychotherapyRelationalityRepressed SpacesRevolt, She SaidSecrets of the SoulSerious ShoppingSex on the CouchSexuationSigmund FreudSoul Murder RevisitedSpectral EvidenceSpirit, Mind, and BrainStrangers to OurselvesSubjective Experience and the Logic of the OtherSubjectivity and OthernessSubstance Abuse As SymptomSurrealist Painters and PoetsTaboo SubjectsTalk is Not EnoughThe Art of the SubjectThe Brain and the Inner WorldThe Brain, the Mind and the SelfThe Cambridge Companion to LacanThe Challenge for Psychoanalysis and PsychotherapyThe Clinical LacanThe Colonization Of Psychic SpaceThe Condition of MadnessThe Couch and the TreeThe Cruelty of DepressionThe Dissociative Mind in PsychoanalysisThe Dreams of InterpretationThe Examined LifeThe Fall Of An IconThe Freud EncyclopediaThe Freud FilesThe Freud WarsThe Fright of Real TearsThe Future of PsychoanalysisThe Gift of TherapyThe Heart & Soul of ChangeThe Knotted SubjectThe Last Good FreudianThe Letters of Sigmund Freud and Otto RankThe Mind According to ShakespeareThe Mystery of PersonalityThe Mythological UnconsciousThe Neuropsychology of the UnconsciousThe New PsychoanalysisThe Power of FeelingsThe Psychoanalytic MovementThe Psychoanalytic MysticThe Psychoanalytic Study of the ChildThe Psychoanalytic Study of the ChildThe Psychodynamics of Gender and Gender RoleThe Puppet and the DwarfThe Real World Guide to Psychotherapy PracticeThe Revolt of the PrimitiveThe Seminar of Moustafa SafouanThe Sense and Non-Sense of RevoltThe Shortest ShadowThe Social History of the UnconsciousThe Surface EffectThe Symmetry of GodThe Tragedy of the SelfThe Trainings of the PsychoanalystThe UnsayableThe World of PerversionTherapeutic ActionTherapy's DelusionsThis Incredible Need to BelieveThoughts Without A ThinkerTo Redeem One Person Is to Redeem the WorldTrauma and Human ExistenceTraumatizing TheoryUmbr(a)Unconscious knowing and other essays in psycho-philosophical analysisUnderstanding Dissidence and Controversy in the History of PsychoanalysisUnderstanding PsychoanalysisUnfree AssociationsWalking HeadsWay Beyond FreudWhat Does a Woman Want?What Freud Really MeantWhen the Body SpeaksWhere Do We Fall When We Fall in Love?Whose Freud?Why Psychoanalysis?Wilhelm ReichWinnicottWinnicott On the ChildWisdom Won from IllnessWittgenstein on Freud and FrazerWittgenstein Reads FreudWorld, Affectivity, TraumaZizek
On its surface, the purpose of Jacques Bouveresses slim monograph Wittgenstein Reads Freud is simply to expound Wittgensteins unsystematic, fragmentary, scattered, unpublished remarks on psychoanalysis and its founder. But, as Vincent Descombes explains in his introduction, in the intellectual milieu in which it originally appeared (as Philosophie, mythologie et pseudo-science: Wittgenstein lecteur de Freud [Paris: Editions de léclat 1991]), it in effect urged the French intelligentsia to reappraise Freud in the light of Wittgensteins critique. The foil, of course, is Jacques Lacan, whose work is largely responsible for the continued hegemony of psychoanalysis in the French intellectual scene, and while there is no sustained discussion of Lacan in Wittgenstein Reads Freud, there is doubtless much for his devotees to ponder in Bouveresses presentation of Wittgenstein as "an anti-Lacan avant la lettre" (p. 41). Broader intellectual concerns aside, Wittgenstein Reads Freud will be of interest to anyone wanting to understand Wittgensteins idiosyncratic ambivalence to Freuds work, especially because it is, as far as I know, the only book-length treatment of its topic en anglais.
Considered simply as exposition, Wittgenstein Reads Freud is unambitious but competent, dutifully organized by topic. The first chapter "Wittgenstein: Disciple of Freud?" sketches the extent and nature of Wittgensteins interest in Freud. Philosophically, Wittgenstein was unimpressed by Freud. Although it is suggestive that Wittgenstein conceived of philosophy as therapeutic, he angrily denied that there was any resemblance to psychoanalytic therapy. Certainly there are no traces of depth psychology in his philosophy of psychology, according to which (in the famous phrase) nothing is hidden. Like the author of the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Freud was philosophically interesting only for his philosophical mistakes. (Literally Wittgenstein is reported by G. E. Moore as saying "that Freuds book on this subject [i.e., jokes] was a very good book for looking for philosophical mistakes, and that the same was true of his writings in general.") Wittgenstein was, however, fascinated by the cultural impact of psychoanalysis, the remarkable appeal it appeared to have: his remarks on Freud emphasize the power of the Freudian mythology to win adherents. If there is anything to complain about here, it is perhaps only that Bouveresse touches very lightly on the anti-Freudian sentiments prevalent in fin de siècle Vienna of which Wittgenstein was presumably aware.
In the next chapter, Bouveresse discusses Wittgensteins critique of Freuds conception of the unconscious. Unfortunately, the discussion here is, in my view, the weakest in the book. First, the exposition simply fails to disentangle the threads of Wittgensteins critique adequately, as is shown by the fact that Bouveresse resorts to wholesale quotation (see especially the long quotation on pp. 26-27). Second, although Bouveresse originally promised to "show that [Wittgensteins] position on Freudian theory would not come as a surprise to readers familiar with the body of his philosophy, even if they were entirely unaware of his interest in psychoanalysis and his pronouncements on it" (p. xvii), when it comes to explaining how the private language considerations of the Philosophical Investigations militate against the perceptual model of consciousness accepted by Freud, he only mutters, "I have dealt elsewhere and at length with Wittgensteins criticism" (p. 24), which is not exactly illuminating. Third, although Wittgensteins remarks on Freud extend over two decades, the exposition treats them as unitary. For example, in The Blue Book, Wittgenstein writes, "Imagine a language in which, instead of I found nobody in the room, one said I found Mr. Nobody in the room. Imagine the philosophical problems which would arise out of such a convention." (Thus Wittgenstein is in effect the Bil Keane avant la lettre, to the presumable gratification of fans of the cartoon "The Family Circus," if there are any.) Bouveresse suggests that Wittgensteins diagnosis of the philosophical problem of the unconscious would be in the same vein: the inappropriate substitution of the substantival ("the unconscious") for the adjectival ("unconsciously"). Perhaps he is right for the Wittgenstein of the 1930s, when The Blue Book was composed, but Wittgenstein eventually rethought much of what he said in the 1930s, and it is interesting to note that the same diagnosis is not to be found in his 1940s conversations on Freud with Rush Rhees.
Chapter 3, devoted to what Bouveresse calls "the generalizing impulse," deals clearly and straightforwardly with Freuds tendency always to seek unitary, totalizing, wholly general explanations, often on the basis of pitifully few instances. Wittgenstein, who reportedly considered for his Philosophical Investigations the motto "Ill teach you differences" (from King Lear), disapproved. Comparing Wittgensteins remarks about psychoanalysis with his remarks about Hertzs mechanics, Copernicuss heliocentricism, and Darwins theory of evolution, Bouveresse seizes the opportunity to consider the question of the scientificity of psychoanalysis at length, discussing the views of Clark Glymour, Adolf Grünbaum, and the egregious Jeffrey Masson. One mistake here, pointed out by Frank Cioffi in his 1996 review of Wittgenstein Reads Freud (The London Review of Books 18:2), is the suggestion that Freuds patients "claimed" (p. 61) to have been sexually abused as infants; in fact, the stories of abuse were interpretive products of Freuds analysis. For Wittgenstein, however, the scientific status of psychoanalysis is not central: as Bouveresse remarks at the end of the chapter, "it is not really very important whether Freuds reconstructions are true or false if, as Wittgenstein believes, they are basically accepted because of their enormous charm, received spontaneously as explanations that must be true and not as hypotheses whose truth or falseness is crucial" (p. 68).
The next chapter of Wittgenstein Reads Freud is concerned with Wittgensteins remarks on what he once referred to as "an abominable mess" the confusion of reasons and causes, the philosophical mistake par excellence. Bouveresses task here is especially difficult, for, as Cioffi remarks, "much that Wittgenstein has to say about this treacherous antithesis is only peripherally related to his claim that Freud confused them." As in chapter 2, Bouveresse appears to be insufficiently attentive to the possibility of Wittgensteins change of opinion, running together texts from the 1930s and 1940s. It is also troubling that he relies so heavily on the work of Wittgensteins sometime collaborator Friedrich Waismann. Nevertheless, his exposition here is sensitive and nuanced. Especially noteworthy is his remark that while the distinction between reasons and causes is often understood to be exclusive, nothing in Wittgensteins thought insists on it: "The crucial point seems to be that even if the reason or motive can eventually be a cause, it cannot ever be simply a cause" (p. 77).
Chapter 5 begins by alluding to "three underlying assumptions of Freudian theory" (p. 82), the first of which is the topic of the chapter, psychic determinism. Strangely, on the philosophical problem of determinism, Bouveresse quotes lavishly from writings of the physicist Max Planck. It is unclear to me why he chose to do so. Is it because he takes Planck to have influenced, or to be influenced by, Freud or Wittgenstein? Or because he takes Planck to be authoritative on the topic? Or simply because he takes Planck to have stated the problem nicely? Bouveresse discusses Freuds assumption of determinism for the greater part of the chapter, eventually concluding, quite rightly, that "The principle of determinism which Freud invokes to justify his idea that all the events of mental life mean something hasnt really much to do with determinism
We might call it the principle of interpretability, since it means that all mental events can be interpreted in a certain way that makes them appear to have a meaning, finality, or function" (p. 96). The latter principle is the second underlying assumption, which stems, ultimately, from Freuds lust for generality (which turns out to be the third assumption). Since the first assumption is otiose, Bouveresse might have done better to avoid the trinitarian schema in the first place.
Freuds treatment of slips errors of the tongue and pen, parapraxes, "voluntary" forgettings, and the like is the topic of chapter 6. Wittgensteins criticism of Freud, although astute enough, is not especially striking, and it is unsurprising that Bouveresse devotes much of the chapter to reporting the similar but more developed criticism of Sebastiano Timpanaros The Freudian Slip. Similarly, Wittgensteins criticism of Freuds principles of dream interpretation, the topic of chapter 7, is astute but unremarkable. Bouveresse begins by discussing Freuds broadening of the concept of language to allow for the idea of "the language of dreams"; it is disappointing that he fails to connect Wittgensteins remarks about the meaningfulness of dreams with his remarks (in the Philosophical Investigations and elsewhere) about meaning in general. The remainder of the chapter rehearses the implausibility of Freuds interpretative method, both of dreams and of the product of free association. Finally, in his brief concluding chapter, Bouveresse sums up Wittgensteins verdict on psychoanalysis.
Bouveresses writing is consistently clear, and occasionally punctuated with flashes of sarcastic humor: especially wicked is his comment that "we French are well known for our tendency to sometimes confuse the practice of philosophy with the practice of free association" (p. xviii). Bouveresse himself is not prone to the confusion, but then again he once wrote an essay with the charming title (if memory serves) "Why I am so un-French." He is able to draw upon the resources of analytic philosophy to good effect for example, his discussion of reasons and causes in chapter 4 is materially aided by his judicious discussion of the views of Donald Davidson and Daniel Dennett. And he is certainly no stranger to the rising Anglo-American tide of anti-Freudian scholarship, citing (among others) Adolf Grünbaum, Frank Cioffi, and Frank Sulloway.
For all its virtues, however, Wittgenstein Reads Freud is of fairly limited interest to the educated public at large. There certainly are better ways to learn about Freuds thought. There certainly are better ways to learn about Wittgensteins thought: as Bouveresse acknowledges, his philosophical interest in psychoanalysis was, at bottom, incidental. And there certainly are better critiques of Freud: Wittgensteins is marred not only by its fragmentary nature but by its reliance on various controversial and idiosyncratic philosophical positions he held, its disregard for the historical questions relevant to assessing Freuds work, and its concentration only on Freuds particular brand of psychoanalysis. (Bouveresse acknowledges this as well: "I certainly do not think the question of psychoanalysis can be settled by what Wittgenstein has to say about it, as pertinent as his observations and criticisms in general may be" [p. xviii].) Essential reading for those interested in its topic, Wittgenstein Reads Freud is for everyone else optional.